Skip to the content

Buy oil. They've stopped making it

By Fredrik Nerbrand | 15:39:54 | 12 May 2009

Given the world’s economy is so dependent on oil, one would expect the oil price to have fallen much further during this economic collapse than it has. The fact that oil is currently range-trading around $50 per barrel could, at first glance, seem rather unusual.

Is this the natural course of supply and demand? In our view yes, the latest figures from the EIA (Energy Information Administration) suggest demand from China and other emerging markets continues to rise whilst being offset by a fall in demand from developed markets.

In our view, even a marginal return of global growth is likely to send oil prices higher.  Hence, we hold a long-term (12 month) positive view on oil.

From a supply perspective, discoveries of oil reserves have steadily been declining since reserves peaked in 1980. That said, we are far from running out of oil in the near term.  Nevertheless, the question is how much more marginal supply there is. In our view, we are getting ever closer to “peak oil” – the point when global productivity of oil reaches its maximum rate.

Couple this with a demand outlook which is unlikely to wane in the short term and oil supply is likely to come short of fulfilling global demand. For example, oil demand in 2007, in line with the growing world economy, grew 2.4%, whilst supply grew only 0.9% leading to a deficit in world supply to the tune of 1.7 million barrels of oil produced a day, the largest since mid-2003.

The economic decline witnessed over the last year has had a big impact on oil demand, falling 1.4% globally for the latest figures ending 2008.

Supply over the same period remained static, leading to a period of oversupply in mid-2008 but ending the year with a deficit of 0.6 million barrels of oil produced a day as demand ticked-up again in the final quarter. So, even under the most depressed economic scenarios there is a shortage of oil.

The potential for further increases in oil demand from China can be estimated by looking at the number of barrels consumed per capita. At present 2.2 barrels are consumed per person in China every year and is rising at an annual rate of 5.5% a year. If this annual rate is compounded annually to 2020 our estimations suggest that China’s share of demand would increase from its current 10% to 18%.

As a closing note, please remember that some upside has already been priced into longer dated futures. For example, the price for oil with delivery in 2013 is currently $74.26 compared to a spot of $57.00 (Bloomberg as at 11 May 2009). Despite these higher long term prices we believe longer term contracts may be more appropriate for investments as the slope of the futures curve is very steep at the near end.

Frederik Nerbrand is head of global economic strategy at HSBC Private Bank and an occasional Citywire blogger.

Comments (3)

Geolog - Everything isn't so bad

23:10 | 12 May 2009

"From a supply perspective, discoveries of oil reserves have steadily been declining since reserves peaked in 1980. That said, we are far from running out of oil in the near term". It is no right.

Peak Oil can be mitigated with new exploration technology which provides a threefold increase in oil field discoveries.

www.binaryseismoem.weebly.com

Andrey E. Berg, Ph.D

Clifford J. Wirth, Ph.D. - Oil Depletion is Catastrophic

01:43 | 13 May 2009

Global crude oil production peaked in 2008 and is now declining terminally.

Within a year or two, oil prices will skyrocket as supply falls below demand. OPEC cuts could exacerbate the gap between supply and demand and drive prices even higher.

Independent studies indicate that global crude oil production is now declining from 74 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time, demand will increase. Oil supplies will be even tighter for the U.S. As oil producing nations consume more and more oil domestically they will export less and less. Because demand is high in China, India, the Middle East, and other oil producing nations, once global oil production begins to decline, demand will always be higher than supply. And since the U.S. represents one fourth of global oil demand, whatever oil we conserve will be consumed elsewhere. Thus, conservation in the U.S. will not slow oil depletion rates significantly.

Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. There is no plan nor capital for a so-called electric economy. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, ships, and mining equipment. The independent scientists of the Energy Watch Group conclude in a 2007 report titled: “Peak Oil Could Trigger Meltdown of Society:”

"By 2020, and even more by 2030, global oil supply will be dramatically lower. This will create a supply gap which can hardly be closed by growing contributions from other fossil, nuclear or alternative energy sources in this time frame."

With increasing costs for gasoline and diesel, along with declining taxes and declining gasoline tax revenues, states and local governments will eventually have to cut staff and curtail highway maintenance. Eventually, gasoline stations will close, and state and local highway workers won’t be able to get to work. We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel and gasoline powered trucks for bridge maintenance, culvert cleaning to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, and roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, large transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables from great distances. With the highways out, there will be no food coming from far away, and without the power grid virtually nothing modern works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, water supply, waste water treatment, and automated building systems.

Documented here:

http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/

Julian Brown - Net energy falling since 2005

09:05 | 13 May 2009

As a physicist, I have to say that I find Dr Wirth's somewhat apocalyptic warnings not overstated.

Allowing for net energy content, we are probably already in our fourth year of terminal decline. EIA and IEA world total liquid production figures include steadily more crud (shale, tar sands, GTL, CTL, ethanol etc.) and ever less of the real McCoy - sweet light crude.

The second half of the Age of Oil is going to be much less fun that the first half was.

Have your say here:

Protected by FormShield