Skip to the content

Alarm Clock-1

Delay annuity purchase and you may pay later

By Kevin Pacey | 00:01:00 | 15 March 2009

In more normal stock market conditions it might be feasible to wait for 12 months to see if annuity rates tick up, but these are unprecedented times, says Kevin Pacey, head of Bank of Scotland Annuity Service.

Richard and Susan Jones both celebrated their 65th birthdays last spring. At the time they considered themselves to be in the strong position of not requiring an income from their private pensions, instead living on interest from savings and buy-to-let property.

However, the landscape of the world economy has now shifted significantly. Interest rates have fallen, leaving a large shortfall for those relying on an income from savings. Concerned about whether they should purchase an annuity now or wait to see what rates they may be able to get in the future, they talk to their financial adviser, Brian Culleton.

Missed the boat?

‘So Brian,’ asks Richard, ‘have I totally missed the boat by not purchasing an annuity last spring? The stock market has fallen and interest rates are the lowest they have ever been. How much have I lost?’

‘I wouldn't worry too much Richard,’ replies Brian, ‘let me talk you through some of the details and then we can come up with a plan of action.

‘Last spring, you decided to hold off purchasing an annuity as you were in the fortunate position of not requiring an income from your pension at that time. You decided to delay the purchase, however, and it is true that both the stock market and annuity rates have fallen over the same period.

‘The critical point though is that two years ago we transferred your pension funds into a low-risk cash fund, from more volatile stocks and share funds. Many people approaching retirement age do not make the decision, or simply forget, to transfer their pension into safer funds. Our decision to do this has protected your overall pension fund from the significant turbulence seen in the stock market over the last year.'

Expect less

‘As such, should you want to buy an annuity at the current time, it is true that you would see a drop in income from the amount you could have got last year. For example, an annuity purchased with a pension fund of £100,000 last August would have provided an income of £7,719 per annum, compared with an annuity purchased last month, which would provide £7,348.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  Total pages: 4

It is important to bear in mind that whilst you delay you are forgoing the income you would have received”

Comments (6)

William Phillips

06:45 | 15 Mar 2009

How nice it must be for the great armies of public sector employees not to have to worry their greying heads over such calculations and decisions.

And how bizarre that the fates of hundreds of thousands of the rest of us in old age should be so closely linked to what the great JMK called "the activities of a casino".

Retired Britain- two nations.

andrew buckley

12:53 | 15 Mar 2009

I am one of those civil servants and not at the lowest grades. I have taken out a private pension to supplement the civil service pension in the hope of getting somewhere near the figures quoted in the example after 45 years work. With pay rates frozen final salaries decline in real terms. The grass is not always so much greener.

james - so where's income drawdown?

15:42 | 15 Mar 2009

Excuse my cynicism but I wonder why a head of annuities in a bank doesnt mention insome drawdown and a.s.p's? The last thing to do is buy an annuity. Or is this a case of a Bank wanting to get its greedy mits on someones money for their benefit?

The best advise for anyone approachung retirement is definitely do not buy an annuity. Look at income drawdown and wait.

Is this and advert or info from an Adviser? - James' comment

16:28 | 15 Mar 2009

As James says, annuities are just one option and there has been no mention of the clients attitude to risk.

I am confused whetehr this is supposed to be a real case study, in which case, changing the name of the client is one thing, but changing the name of the adviser seems odd and he doesn't appear on the FSA register, whilst Kevin has a management function it would appear rather than advisory.....

Surname: culleton

Forenames: brian

Individual reference number:

Match level: Starts with

Currently Approved:

Search again

Individual reference number Name Status

No matches found.

KJP01070 - Kevin John Pacey

Controlled functions - Previous

Controlled functions Firm name Start date End date

CF16 Significant Mgt (Desgntd Investment Business) Halifax Independent Financial Advisers Limited

John Richards - Inflation

10:52 | 16 Mar 2009

The example is obviously based on a level annuity, but with the possibility of rampant inflation in the futureas a result of quantative easing''', this should be considered very carefully. One option may be a with profits annuity.

DRK - Doh

13:18 | 16 Mar 2009

You'd have to be completely off your rocker to buy an annuity aged 65 in the present climate, or probably ever.

Is this independent advice, journalism or what?

Have your say here:

Protected by FormShield