Skip to the content

Suburbia-House

What to expect next from mortgage lenders

By Lorna Bourke | 10:58:00 | 10 November 2008

Citywire scours the web for the best writing from across the world. Find out What We are Reading here.

Following last week’s 1.5% cut in bank base rate to 3%, homebuyers are hoping for a big reduction in their mortgage costs. But will it happen?

Halifax immediately announced a full 1.5% cut in its SVR to 5% while RBS, which owns NatWest, made a similar cut in its SVR to 5.19%. Both rates will be applied from December 1. Nationwide also announced it would pass on the full 1.5% cut, taking its SVR to 4.69%.

How long SVRs will remain at this level remains to be seen because these are now ‘best buy’ rates and lenders could be swamped with applications – not least because SVR mortgages traditionally have no early exit penalties and are a very flexible option.

‘Most large lenders won’t accept applications for standard variable rate mortgages any more,’ says Ray Boulger of mortgage broker John Charcol.

Only time will tell how large the reduction may be in fixed and tracker mortgages but it is unlikely to be the full 1.5%, and there are a number of factors that indicate that even if bank base rate falls to 2% homebuyers will still be paying at least 3% to 4% for their money.

Expect a collar

With banks warning the Chancellor that there is a limit to the absolute level of interest rates, it seems likely that all new trackers – when they eventually come back to the market – will have a ‘collar’, or absolute minimum rate, of 3%.

Halifax already has a 3% collar in place on some existing trackers and Nationwide has a collar of 2.75% on many of its tracker products. A minimum rate is likely to become the norm.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  Total pages: 4

Comments (5)

Mike - Misleading info re collar

16:15 | 10 Nov 2008

Your article can easily read as though you are saying that the Nationwide has a minimum rate of 2.75% (and the Halifax of 3%) on its tracker mortgages but this is the minimum bank rate below which further or deeper cuts will not be passed on to borrowers who pay a fixed margin ABOVE the bank base rate, or ABOVE 2.75% if the rate falls below this!

Dislexic Landlord - Buy to Let Mortgages

16:23 | 10 Nov 2008

Good info

I have three BTL mortgages comeing off fixed rate over the next 12 months and was nice suprise

Mortgage Express charge 1.75 % over the BoE base rate and BM salutions charge 1.95% over the base rate so with a BoErate of 3% all my mortgages will be chaaper next year than the fixed rate mortgaages Ive had for 5 years

God knows when a good fixed rate deal comes back on the market time will tell

Grapevine - What 2% rate cut ?

09:53 | 11 Nov 2008

Bank rate cut by 2% in last month, yet yesterday, Monday 10/10 I could and did invest money on term deposit with 2 UK clearers for 12 months @ 6.3% and 2 Yrs @ 6%.

If they reckon they need to pay me DOUBLE the Bank Rate to get my money, what rate are they going to have to charge it out at ?

Dont hold your breath for morgages being available @ 3.95% other than on terms deliberately designed as political window dressing with conditions to exclude 99% of potential borrowers !

Brian

13:15 | 11 Nov 2008

Buy to lets shouldn`t have Mortgages.... They are a business and should be treated as such by banks only.... building societies should be lending only to home owners !!

As for buy to let-ers as there is supposedly a famine as far as houses go why should greedy b`s be borrowing my money so that they can have 2 & more properties. Homes should not be treated as businesses or at the least have more onerous lending proceedures than for homeowners (even i would say, than real businesses that create employment and wealth)

Sam - 'we are not charities'

13:35 | 12 Nov 2008

The comment "The banks warned the chancellor they are ‘not charities’ ".

They weren't saying these words when the government was bailing them out with millions of taxpayer's pounds!

Have your say here:

Protected by FormShield