Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a474242
Hargreaves calls for inquiry into Keydata collapse
by Daniel Grote on Feb 25, 2011 at 09:13
Peter Hargreaves and chief executives of some of the largest wealth management groups have called for an independent inquiry into the failure of Keydata.
Hargreaves (pictured), along with Brewin Dolphin executive chairman Jamie Matheson, Rathbone Brothers chief executive Andy Pomfret and Charles Stanley chairman Sir David Howard, said lessons needed to be learned from Keydata's collapse following the record £326 million Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) interim levy.
'It is in the interests of consumers, clients, our industry and indeed our regulators that lessons regarding Keydata's failure are learned. We therefore urge the setting up of a full and independent inquiry to establish what happened and how it can be avoided in the future,' the said, in a letter to the Financial Times.
'With regulatory robustness and reform currently at the top of many agendas it seems appropriate to explore whether improvements might be made in the light of a well publicised failure; an independent review of the circumstances surrounding Keydata's collapse would help to inform this.'
Also included among the signatories are Cazenove Capital Management chief executive Andrew Ross, Fleming Family & Partners chief executive Mark Davies, Smith & Williamson chairman Gareth Pearce and Vestra Wealth managing partner David Scott.
They said they were concerned about the way the bill of compensating clients of Keydata had been allocated. Investment intermediaries have picked up £93 million of the levy, with the rest of the bill footed by fund managers.
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
More about this article:
More from us
- Hargreaves calls for FSCS review after £3m bill
- Brewins faces £6m FSCS bill; Charles Stanley to pay £2.6m
- FSCS sets levy at £326m; investment intermediaries to pay £93m





4 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Bob Donaldson
Feb 25, 2011 at 10:34
It is interesting that these people only stick their head above the parapet when it affects them and not before. Perhaps if they were more vociferous in the way this industry is regulated, compensated and basically abused by all, then we might get some sense of justic.
report thisBanged to Rights
Feb 25, 2011 at 11:19
Bob - If you read the letter they still "support the FSCS" what they are grumbling about is paying out money.
They still have no real interest in the regime structure being unsustainable.
report thisAnitaki
Feb 25, 2011 at 11:19
Yes Bob, If one runs an "execution only" business, it might have been thought that ALL calls to pay any compensation to any party would thus have been avoided.
I think this has come as a shock/wake-up-call (delete as appropriate, depending on which side of the fence you are sitting) to the execution only industry.
report thisJulian Stevens
Feb 25, 2011 at 11:45
Whom does Mr H propose should set up this inquiry? Who will fund it? Will it look at the FSA's role in the matter, primarily its failure to act on information in its possession as long ago, we now learn as 2007? Unlikely, because the FSA, despite what Hoban trots out like an automaton, has the handy fire-proof armour-plating of statutory immunity from prosecution.
Nothing will come of this.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.