The man who wants to save child trust funds
Prev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesby Gavin Lumsden on Jul 30, 2010 at 13:23
A campaign is growing to save child trust funds from the scrap heap. Do you think parents and family should be allowed to continue saving into the schemes for children, even if the government stops handing out free money?
Fight on his hands
Martin Shaw, chief executive of the Association of Financial Mutuals, is among those fighting to save child trust funds (CTFs) from extinction.
AFM is a trade body representing mutual insurers, such as Family Investments and the Children’s Mutual, that provide over half the CTFs that have been taken out by parents since 2005.
In May Shaw and the insurers were shocked to hear the government announce it wanted to abolish CTFs as a first step to slash public spending and reduce the budget deficit.
This move signalled the start of ‘austerity Britain’ and divided opinion. While some welcomed the cut for removing one example of wasteful spending by a ‘nanny’ state, others complained it was axing a genuinely good idea by the previous government.
What are child trust funds?
Labour launched child trust funds five years ago, giving parents of new-born children vouchers for £250 with which to save into the new accounts. The plan was to give parents another £250 when the child reached seven years. Children from poor families received an extra £250 – £500 in total – at each stage.
The plan was for the savings to grow free of income and capital gains taxes until the child was 18. At this point the money could be rolled into an individual savings account (ISA) and continue to accumulate tax free, or provide a nest egg to pay for university fees, put towards a deposit or blow on a gap year – anything that the young person wanted to do.
Shaw and AFM have joined the Save Child Savings Alliance (SCSA) to convince the government to retain child trust funds even if it removes the subsidies to save around £500 million.
They argue child trust funds have been successful in helping restore a savings culture in Britain. They say that:
- 5 million children now have a child trust fund and
- 40% of accounts are topped up by additional contributions from parents and relatives
Hope of reprieve
After a recent meeting with Mark Hoban, financial secretary to the Treasury, Shaw is hopeful the message may be getting through.
Although the government is desperate to save money it has spoken of its wish to ‘reinvigorate’ pensions and long-term savings. It may decide to allow parents to continue contributing up to £1,200 a year into existing CTFs and open new accounts for their children, all with the benefit of tax relief.
Last month Hoban created an opening when he announced that the government was considering launching a range of simplified financial products to encourage the nation to save.
News sponsored by:
Today's featured articles
Follow us on Twitter
- More at twitter.com/fullyinvested
From the Forums
More about this:
More from us
- Save child trust funds says new lobby group
- Ending Child Trust Funds won't stop parents saving for children
- Child Trust Funds scrapped as Osborne reveals spending cuts
- Should Child Trust Funds be restricted to the poorest parents?
- How to make the most of Child Trust Funds
- Rate Watch: the best rates for mortgages, savings accounts and child trust funds
- Child trust funds could sock away cash for first home
- Child trust funds to help teach personal finance in primary schools
2 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Guy MacNaughton
Jul 30, 2010 at 15:18
CTF's were a gimmick, a cheap vote winner and not an appropriate use of tax payers money. And like so many other such schemes, of little long term value, helping the few that qualify. "Small", simple non-invasive government is what we want. It is not surprising that the lobbying companies have taken up in arms, they were benefiting from Government/taxpayers money. Instead encourage investment by adults for minors and give tax breaks if it is really necessary. But isn't this already in place with current pension legislation?
report thisjingoistic
Jul 30, 2010 at 16:17
Never agreed with them in the first place. If you want money for the kids star a savings account, you should not expect taxpayers to help out. Whilst we are at it abolish Family allowance or what ever it is called, again amother thing the Tax payer has to pay for,
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.