Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a417147
Stress tests: what the results mean for bank shares
Many European bank stocks have risen following publication of the EU stress test results, although there are concerns the tests may not have been tough enough.
Markets
Shares in many banks across Europe advanced on Monday after the European Union published the results of its stress tests late on Friday.
But the publication has done little to end the debate about whether the tests were rigorous enough and whether they really tell us what we need to know about the strength of the European banking sector.
Many winners but too few losers
Of the 91 banks tested just seven failed. Most of the banks that failed were not listed on the stock market. Many have already been promised state help and most are generally deemed to be too small to matter.
Some analysts have run their own numbers and have suggested that if more appropriate and stringent tests were applied the number of failures would be closer to 25.
Others say the €3.5 billion (£2.9 billion) sum the testers say banks need to raise is one-tenth of the lowest estimate from analysts, adding to worries that a key opportunity to strengthen the banks has been missed.
One of the benefits of the test is we now have a greater idea of which banks have the most exposure to government debt in the indebted southern European economies.
As expected, Spain's Santander – which in the UK owns Alliance & Leicester, Abbey and Bradford & Bingley and is looking to buy some RBS branches – did well as did France's BNP Paribas. The relative strength of the Nordic banks was never in doubt.
Ongoing concern about some European banks
Joe Dickerson, analyst at Execution Noble, believes the results for the Spanish banks were particularly worrying.
Running his own tests which assume more risk from property developers, he believes the Spanish banks need to raise €23 billion – €20 billion more than the Bank of Spain said is needed.
Many commentators agree the very low European economic growth assumed by the testers was sufficiently pessimistic but think the pass rate for the ratio of assets to liabilities should have been set higher.
There is also concern that six German banks did not publish a detailed break-down of their government debt holdings, fuelling suspicion they have something to hide.
The UK banks were never at risk
Four UK banks were tested; Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and RBS. All passed with flying colours. That was never in doubt as the quartet had all already passed much more stringent tests in the UK.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
What others are saying
Look up the shares
Archive
Today's articles
- Week Ahead: waiting uncomfortably for Greece to go
- Investment trusts beat unit trusts in emerging markets
- Market Blog: confident US consumers lift the mood
- Smart Investor: let the news flow wash over you
- What are investment funds and how do they work?
- Your finances after... marriage
- Lyttleton takes summer break from BlackRock funds
- Threadneedle bond boss Fitzsimmons exits





7 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Jul 26, 2010 at 13:23
Hmm, judging by previous experience I wonder if the so-called "stress tests" tested for enough stress? Somehow, considering the events of 2007-8 I suspect not!
report thisJonathan
Jul 26, 2010 at 13:24
You might find if you buy Lloyds that they don't advance rapidly. The govenment own most of Lloyds and are going to gradually sell them, which they may even have started doing now.
report thisChris B (Slough UK)
Jul 26, 2010 at 13:53
The tests change nothing and as everyone suspects were only as stressful as those in power wanted them to be. The tests also do not cover the very likely sovreign default of a country and possible knock on effects. Time will tell.
report thisjoe stalin
Jul 26, 2010 at 14:08
As long as banks are required to have absurdly high tier one capital ratios Vince and any of the muppets currently enjoying the oversight of our banmks can forget about the banks becoming more willing to lend. The sooner the lunatic fringe back off the sooner the tax payers which have lent the finance industry a few bob to stave off bankruptcy will get his money back with a handsome profit to boot. Vince and his band of sandal wearing bearded bunch of anoraks need to ride off into the sunset and start hugging some trees and leave our financial sector to sort itself out.
report thisJonathan
Jul 26, 2010 at 15:34
joe stalin, what's wrong with sandals and anoraks? I agree about beards though.
report thisjoe stalin
Jul 26, 2010 at 16:42
I think you catch my drift Jonathan :)
report thisGraham Thompson
Jul 26, 2010 at 18:57
Wasn't our financial sector sorting itself out at our expense before, and causing the mess we are now in?
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.