Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a445168

Smart Investor: why I'm ignoring the appeal of Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered bank may well be the well-behaved pup from a troublesome litter but uncertainty over the banking sector means I am avoiding its shares.

Standard Chartered bank may well be the well-behaved pup from a troublesome litter but uncertainty over the banking sector means I am avoiding its shares.

The Standard Chartered success story

The recent rights issue by FTSE 100 listed bank Standard Chartered may bring back memories of 2008 and 2009, when rights issues were the must-have accessory for banks. Back then the banking world was crumbling: HBOS and RBS were essentially bust and other major players were forced to enter asset protection arrangements and debt guarantee schemes.

However, to its credit Standard Chartered managed to steer clear of government aid and protection/debt guarantee schemes. Furthermore, its profits increased during the credit crunch and have continued to grow since. Its share price has done equally well, reaching an all-time high of £18.87 in the last month. A good time for the board to ask shareholders for more cash in the form of a rights issue, some may argue.

So, what view should the smart investor take on Standard Chartered after the £3.2 billion cash call? Is this bank worth buying?

At the mercy of regulators

The first thing to consider about Standard Chartered is its sector; banking. This is a sector which is currently at the mercy of regulators, with the Financial Services Authority and its equivalents across the world attempting to impose rules and regulations to prevent another credit crunch. It is difficult for banks to operate in the current climate, whether they are to blame for this or not, because the rules of the game are changing and it is unclear what the industry will look like in three years' time. This makes investing in any bank a highly dubious proposition from the outset for any smart investor.

Big profits from Asia

In terms of profitability Standard Chartered scores an A+. Not only has it increased net profit year on year for the last five years, it has done so during one of the worst periods in its sector’s history. Net profit has increased steadily from £1,271 million in 2005 to £2,243 million in 2009 (assuming an exchange rate of £1 = $1.55). What is even more impressive is the fact this has been achieved under a new chief executive, with Peter Sands (pictured) taking the helm in late 2006.

In addition Standard Chartered focuses its business on the East rather than West. Therefore it could be argued that it is better placed to deliver profits growth than, for example, Barclays or Lloyds, which are more reliant on the UK market.

In terms of capital ratios Standard Chartered is relatively well placed at 11% post rights issue. Although this may be adequate for now, regulators could easily have a change of heart and increase requirements from the expected 7% to a higher figure in years to come. This is undoubtedly the reason for a second rights issue (the first one came in November 2008), especially since new rules on the risk weighting of loans could reduce this capital ratio by 1% in future.

But not good value

However, all this talk of profits growth, target markets, capital ratios and uncertainty fails to mention the key reason why smart investors should avoid Standard Chartered: price vs value. In other words Standard Chartered is not particularly good value.

Standard Chartered’s net asset value per share is around £9.33 (note, all figures vary depending on the exchange rate) which means that at the current price of £18 per share, £8.67 is goodwill. Earnings per share last year were around £1.03 and thus the current price includes over eight years of record-breaking net profit as goodwill, assuming of course that profits now flat line.

Whilst stagnant profits are unlikely, smart investors should remember that no company has experienced exponential growth and that Standard Chartered has increased profit by 76% over the last five years. At a time when regulators are themselves caught in the headlights, they may introduce measures that severely impact the profitability of banks in the medium to long run.

Uncertainty puts me off

Standard Chartered has many merits and has performed incredibly well during an exceptionally difficult period. It has managed to grow profits when others around it were falling apart and has focused its business in areas which may have vast potential for profits in the long run.

However its future remains uncertain; regulators are implementing new rules that may harm future profitability and growth. Standard Chartered may be the well-behaved pup from a troublesome litter, but it should not yet command the price of a pedigree. Smart investors should avoid at the current price.

4 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Roy England

Oct 31, 2010 at 09:36

Robert - Your timing is off. For sure STAN shares are not where newcomers should by buying and perhaps holders should be selling for the reasons you set out. But if you have the shares already why would you not take up the rights issue? It's not as if the money is going to disappear immediately into an acquisition. It is staying in the balance sheet - at least for the time being. You haven't made a case.

Regulatory uncertainty is accepted. But what do you think will happen? Assets merely shrink as a ratio of capital? Yes, but margins will widen too.

Moreover, STAN's share price is underpinned by the possibility of a mad-cap buyer emerging. STAN's franchise is unique - and that includes HSBC.

R

P.S. I'm taking up my rights.

report this

joe stalin

Oct 31, 2010 at 10:13

There is no way that Standard Chartered offers the same degree of upside potential as our other banks. Sure they managed to escape the worst of the ravages experienced by most of its competitors partly because their exposure to US and European markets was not significant but also in part because they did not stand behind some of the similar SIV type products they peddled leaving investors in them to pick up the pieces. They were also instrumental in draughting a "rescue" plan for Lloyds and RBS ensuring the terms were as onerous as possible in the hope of giving themselves some comeptitive breathing space. A good bank yes but an attractive investment at these levels- who are we kidding ?

report this

chazza

Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03

I recall that Standard Chartered has nearly always been regarded as over-valued - which is why I put off buying for so long before ignoring advice and plunging in - in 2008. I am very glad I did as it is now among my more profitable investments.

As Roy suggests, it is difficult to compare Standard Chartered with other UK-listed banks when its operations are so concentrated in parts of the world whose economies are growing so much more strongly than the UK / EU. Its premium is justified because it is a conservatively managed emerging markets play. I too am taking up the rights and regard it as a long-term hold.

report this

john_r

Oct 31, 2010 at 16:38

Thanks for your deliberations but after nervouly taking up the last rights issue at £3.90 in December 2008 I go into this latest one at £12.80 in fact with less trepidadation. There is a new world growing in the East and besides that there is a £5 / share insurance money in the price.

The market isn't showing Roberts nervousness either as the 200day trendline still solidly points to the sky.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Tools from Citywire Money

Today's articles

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion
Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet