Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a405794
Should there be a tax on chewing gum?
And would such a tax stop people spitting their gum into the street?
Markets
People aged over 50 want the government to impose a tax on chewing and bubble gum to help keep Britain’s streets clean, research by Saga revealed today.
Of the 14,000 people Saga surveyed, 82% said they were in favour of a levy on synthetic chewing gum. One in five thought a 1p tax per piece of gum was appropriate, while 20% said gum fans should pay a more punitive 10p per stick.
Saga argues that although a chewing gum tax might not make a big dent in Britain’s £156 billion deficit, the money could help offset the £150 million paid by local councils to clean ‘polka dot pavements’.
Saga also claims the tax would encourage people to chew natural biodegradable gum and dispose of their gum more responsibly.
But what do you think? Would a tax on chewing gum really make people think twice before they spit their gum out onto the street. Or would a tax in fact have the opposite effect and make people think they had paid for the right to dispose of their gum wherever they want?
What’s more, is taxing everyone who enjoys a stick of gum now and then really fair when it is only a minority of people who cause the mess? Should the government instead just concentrate on introducing harsher punishments and bigger fines for the people who are caught littering?
But then, how do you catch someone in the act? You can’t employ people to patrol the streets, following anyone who purchases a packet of Wrigley’s or blows an innocent bubble?
So, although a tax on chewing gum may not be ‘fair’ on those who conscientiously place their finished chewing gum in the bin, perhaps it is the only realistic way to fund the clean up costs?
What do you think?
Tools from Citywire Money
Today's articles
- Week Ahead: waiting uncomfortably for Greece to go
- Investment trusts beat unit trusts in emerging markets
- Market Blog: confident US consumers lift the mood
- Smart Investor: let the news flow wash over you
- What are investment funds and how do they work?
- Your finances after... marriage
- Lyttleton takes summer break from BlackRock funds
- Threadneedle bond boss Fitzsimmons exits





22 comments so far. Why not have your say?
John Phelps
Jun 10, 2010 at 15:56
how about a facility for handing your chewed gum in and being able to reclaim the tax !
report thisWrigleys
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:04
i wish all i had to worry about was poxy chewing gum, can't all the dole wallers do it for free
report thisMartin C
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:05
I would ban the stuff but would also support taxation.
report thisGerry O'Kane
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:12
Oh God not again... I've been through all this in Singapore and they looked like a bunch of tossers then...
report thisPolitic-Al
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:13
I'll chew this one over.
I don't agree on more tax, just heavier fines and a day or two cleaning chewing gun from the street should sort the problem.
report thisAlan T
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:13
I don't believe a tax on sticks sold would influence overall sales, nor do I believe that the tax raised would be spent on cleaning the streets, so perhaps a better way would be legislation to allow councils to bill manufacturers directly for the cost of cleaning pavements. A direct cost might encourage manufacturers to change to a degradable formula, failing that I'd ban the stuff also. Banning works for Singapore.
report thisTim Johnson
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:24
I'd favour an outright ban. Have to say, sometimes "Nanny States" like Singapore (Who, incidentally. no longer ban the stuff but don't have the problem that we do because people got the idea eventually that it was antisocial) have the right approach. It is only after our pavements are clean again and we no longer find it on our cinema seats or the bottoms of our shoes, everyone will appreciate what a menace the stuff is.
report thisDavid Warner
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:28
Excellent idea - I have witnessed the midnight steaming squads cleaning our pavements from this filthy stuff. What do they do in Germany? They're pretty obsessive about clean streets
report thisJeremy Bosk
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:55
Alan T has it right. The manufacturers would soon develop a biodegradable product. I also agree with the idea of forced labour to clean the streets. Catching the culprits could be done by secretly installed and roving cameras with the proviso that anything else caught on camera beyond littering and short of murder or rape would be ignored.
Takeaway packaging and alcohol containers should also be made biodegradable. Living in a bedsit area, my front garden is regularly full of bottles, cans and styrofoam containers. A year spent tethered to the shafts a litter collecting cart for 12 hours every Saturday and Sunday would encourage a sense of civic responsibility in the most drunken lout.
report thisJonathan
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:59
The pavements round here are covered in chewing gum. There should be a tax for the damage and unsightly views it causes.
report thisJonas Cord
Jun 10, 2010 at 17:02
Some "people" spit on the streets anyway, without chewing gum, which is equally revolting and should be made an offence.
report thisAnonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Jun 10, 2010 at 17:28
Tax at £1.00 a packet collected from the manufacturers to pay for the cleaning of our streets.
report thisFrank Cooper
Jun 10, 2010 at 17:31
The levy on chewing gum sales should be so high that confectionary companies will have doubts as to whether they can sell enough to make a profit. Then the whole of the levy should be passed to Local Councils for a regular "clean-up" operation
report thisKeith Simmonds
Jun 10, 2010 at 17:37
There is a tax on chewing gum already. It is called VAT.
report thisRoger Birchall
Jun 10, 2010 at 18:11
I thought a lot of councils in the past had laws banning spitting in the street (to prevent spread of TB ?). Dumping chewing gum is tantamount to spitting so probably the old laws could be applied. The practice of spitting encouraged by the disgusting behaviour exhibited every time a football match is shown on TV also needs dealing with.
report thisU gauge
Jun 10, 2010 at 22:59
Wrigleys once put out an ad entitled 'Certainly Not Here', showing a number of elegant occasions when you would not chew gum. 'But in the privacy of your home, we would recommend that you enjoy our product' -- or words to that effect. Chewing gum in the street is not recommended and is certainly not elegant.
report thisChristopher
Jun 11, 2010 at 09:37
What about a returnable deposit scheme as they used to have for beer bottles. Return your used gum to the shop and get your deposit returned
report thisAnonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'
Jun 12, 2010 at 15:47
Absolutely, tax it out of existence - its a revolting habit to distribute it everywhere when you've finished with it, and the same goes for spitting - we need a ban on any TV station showing any incident of spitting at football matches. The brainless idiots doing it would soon learn to curb their habits when their publicity value took a dive.
report thiscolin macdermott
Jun 15, 2010 at 15:47
Yes of course a tax should be paid because gum is not a food its spate out - dumped -stuck to the benches in churches - crematoriams- seats of busses just anywhere but in a waste bin and taxing it wont stop the foul behaviour of transferring body fluids to be available for someone else to touch, remember the scourge of TB.
report thisAnonymous 3 needed this 'off the record'
Jun 15, 2010 at 17:19
Yes, taxes should hammer undesirable activities such as chewing gum, plastic surgery, exotic pets, drinks with added sugar, SUV's. and garden gnomes. The upper limit on NI contributions should also be scrapped.
report thisAnonymous 4 needed this 'off the record'
Jun 16, 2010 at 18:16
The tax wouldnt be used to clean it up, if all of the tax on vehicles, road tax and fuel tax had been used to improve transport infrastructure we would have the best most efficient transport system in the World.
Chewing gum tax wont keep your soles any cleaner.
report thisRoughie
Jun 28, 2010 at 23:57
I must say, "Wrigleys" comment had me smiling! The problem is not the gum. I like chewing gum, but I don't flob it onto the bus seats... The problem is one that reflects many of the other ills in our society, in that a large number of people simply have no respect for their fellow neighbour.
Punitive measures seem to have had little effect in changing behaviours, so I think we need to return to some good old fashion values and community thinkings. Lets mark out the offenders in our communities and shame them into changing their ways. Failing that, send them to our local NHS dentist and she will pull all their teeth out for £45.60... sounds good value to me!
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.