Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a627308
RBS closes cautious funds that lost investors money
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has closed two funds it launched to great fanfare last year after they failed to protect investors' money.
Markets
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), the state-owned bank, has closed two 'mixed asset' funds less than two years after their launch after they failed to shield investors from the turbulent stock markets.
The £50 million Volatility Controlled Balanced Managed and the £49 million Volatility Controlled Cautious Managed funds were launched in January last year and were meant to limit the volatility of the stock market by investing in a range of asset classes.
However, despite tracking 11 indices following equities, property, bonds and commodities, the Volatility Controlled Balanced Managed fund lost 8.2%, while the Volatility Controlled Cautious Managed fund lost 10.05%, far worse than comparable funds.
A spokesman for RBS said: ‘Following a review undertaken by Royal Bank of Scotland Markets & International Banking, it was decided to close the Volatility Controlled Cautious fund and the Volatility Controlled Balanced fund (sub-funds of Brushfield Defined Funds),’ he said. ‘The Financial Services Authority approved the application to formally terminate the funds on 9 October and investors' units were redeemed at net asset value on 11 October.’
If you are interested in mixed asset funds our Mixed Assets league tables shows which funds are doing best and which worst across five sectors.
Sponsored By:
More about this:
Look up the funds
Look up the shares
More from us
Archive
Today's articles
Diary of a Dumb Investor: hit by emerging market sell-off by Dumb Investor
Disappointing Artemis Alpha trust has contrarian appeal by James Carthew
RSA, Whitbread lead FTSE higher as investors watch Fed by Chris Marshall
What you could receive in the Co-op Bank debt swap by Michelle McGagh
Transport and fuel push UK inflation up to 2.7% by Alex Steger
Tools from Citywire Money
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
Read more...
Disappointing Artemis Alpha trust has contrarian appeal
by James Carthew on Jun 18, 2013 at 15:04






2 comments so far. Why not have your say?
mo khan
Oct 18, 2012 at 12:05
yes, how much of the underperfomance went into bonuses? and approved FSA.
report thisRoger Lawson
Oct 18, 2012 at 17:43
This looks to me to be a simple example of no reward without risk. By trying to cover clients against all volatility (by moving in and out of cash), they have simply produced an under performing result. Not helped by total reliance on index derivatives rather than direct holdings. A classic example of a concept one could promote to unsophisticated investors that at first glance might have appeared sensible. Yet another case of a bank inventing a new financial product that was not in the clients interest but might generate some more income for them.
Roger Lawson, ShareSoc
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.