Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a444278
Pensions: plans for automatic enrolment of workers get green light
Every UK business should offer a company pension scheme from 2012 and automatically enrol employees earning more than £7,500 a year, a government report recommends.
Markets
Every UK business should offer a company pension scheme from 2012 and automatically enrol employees earning more than £7,500 a year, a government report recommends.
The government review of auto-enrolment recommends that workers be automatically enrolled into an occupational scheme, no matter how small the company. Workers will be able to choose to opt-out of the scheme, whcih is called the National Employment Savings Trust, or Nest.
The Pensions Act (2008) stated that employers should provide an adequate pension scheme for eligible employees – those aged 22 or more and earning at least £5,035 a year. If a company does not provide a scheme, employees will be auto-enrolled in and employers forced to make a minimum contribution. Today's Department for Work and Pensions report increases the minimum entry level to £7,500.
The report says employers should be given three months before staff are auto-enrolled to ease the burden on companies employing a large number of temporary employees.
If staff choose to enrol before the three month period then companies will have to make contributions.
Criticisms
The ‘Nest’ pension scheme, originally named 'Personal Accounts' under a plan devised by the previous Labour government, got the coalition's go-ahead in the small print of the coalition’s Spending Review.
This follows months of speculation over whether Nest would be scrapped. Critics of the scheme say that workers will choose to opt out rather than pay the minimum 4% contributions. Employers have expressed fears about the costs and many are likely to level-down - reduce future pension contributions into existing and new schemes - to meet the additional cost of newly pensioned employees.
Tools from Citywire Money
Today's articles
- Week Ahead: waiting uncomfortably for Greece to go
- Investment trusts beat unit trusts in emerging markets
- Market Blog: confident US consumers lift the mood
- Smart Investor: let the news flow wash over you
- What are investment funds and how do they work?
- Your finances after... marriage
- Lyttleton takes summer break from BlackRock funds
- Threadneedle bond boss Fitzsimmons exits





6 comments so far. Why not have your say?
David987
Oct 27, 2010 at 10:41
Whats the point of the scheme if you can opt out?
Why not start employee contributions at 2% and increase to 4% over say 5 years but make it compulsory to stay in.
report thisJohn robert
Oct 27, 2010 at 10:41
This scheme is a tax by another name.
It gives no guarantee of a pension. That depends on investment returns and annuity rates.
The pension could be zero.. Could be much more.
It is also a fund which the Government can raid at any time. This has happened in many countries.
My advice to an individual. This scheme is too risky. Do not touch it.
report thisJonathan Court
Oct 27, 2010 at 11:26
This is not a pension scheme, it is just another tax on employees and employers, the ridiculously high NIC contributions already made by employers and employees are for what ......
How gullible are the British general public.
report thisRose G
Oct 27, 2010 at 13:04
Looking at what has happened to existing pension schemes, as well as to savings accounts, I will be advising my nearest & dearest to keep away from the banks, & not let any government con them into taking up schemes which are raided by the tossers (politicians & financial institutions) at anytime they want to raid the savings.
Foolishly, in a pension scheme, which will no doubt be reduced as the tossers see fit - will not let my children go the same way.
The next best thing is to stash their savings in the mattress - it worked for gran & grand dad!
report thisManilal Shah
Oct 27, 2010 at 19:19
I do not trust Government or Financial Institution. It does cost me in charges
of 20% and my Pension is less then what I have paid over years.I would have
been better off investing myself with no restriction.
M. Shah
report thisP Williams
Oct 27, 2010 at 20:15
Agree with Jonathan Court - what are NIC for? Also, this Governemnt are now talking about stealing any SERP contributions to pay for their grand idea to increase pensions for ALL - don't trust any GOVERNMENT or Insurance company with your hard earned cash is the hard lesson that I have learn't.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.