Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a424453

Lifting the lid on Woodford's controversial Zimbabwe fund holding

Masawara, the newly listed Jersey fund investing in the African nation, has proved a controversial bet for star Invesco Perpetual fund manager Neil Woodford.

Documents obtained by Citywire have helped lift the lid on Neil Woodford’s Zimbabwean investment.

Masawara, the Jersey incorporated fund investing in the African nation, has proved a controversial bet for Woodford in his Invesco Perpetual Income funds.

This week the fund was admitted to the Alternative Investments Market (AIM) in London, where it has raised $24.6 million (£15.5 million) through the issue of 30 million ordinary shares. It aims to deliver long-term capital growth for investors, buying into Zimbabwean mines, oil companies, property, agriculture and telecoms, as well as taking part in the privatisation of state-owned assets and the anticipated recovery in the region’s fragile economy.

But while Masawara’s prospectus touts Zimbabwe, ruled by Robert Mugabe (pictured above) with prime minister Morgan Tsvangirai, as a country ripe for investment, with significant capital growth within five years the reward for adventurous investors, it also underscores the region’s reputation as a territory laden with risk and the threat of crime and corruption.

‘The group, and companies in which it invests, may in the future be the subject of government investigations and other accusations of corrupt practices or illegal activities, including improper payments to individuals,’ the prospectus said. It advised that the fund cannot guarantee that rules designed to prevent this will be adhered to, as well as warning that crime could materially damage its finances.

The prospectus also highlights the extent to which Zimbabwe’s volatile regulatory environment could affect the company. In particular, it highlights the need to seek approval from the authorities before removing or repatriating any Zimbabwean assets out of the country.

It warns: ‘The company cannot guarantee that it will be permitted to have its investment capital returned outside of Zimbabwe, or converted into its operating currency, US dollars, upon divestment of an interest in a Zimbabwean company.’

Eiris, an independent research group that assesses the ethical performance of companies, said that all reputable funds should outline firmly their investment policies.

Zimbabwe, under the control of the coalition Government of National Unity, currently features in Eiris’s Countries of Concern list.

‘Our Countries of Concern list takes into account "human rights risks", including such issues as respect for political rights and civil liberties, political instability, workers’ rights, women’s economic rights and physical integrity rights,’ an Eiris spokesman said.

‘A good fund should have strong statements about what it will and will not invest in.’

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

23 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Gavin Thirlwall

Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09

Interesting write-up, but it seems an odd investment for an income fund, even though 29.5% of Masawara will only be a small fraction of the £16bn Neil Woodford manages in these two funds.

Even if Woodford believes it is a strong investment, surely it is the kind of investement you would be expecting a natural resources or global emerging markets fund to make?

report this

michael callender

Aug 19, 2010 at 12:19

Tomes have been written about the crazed Mugabe & how he has demolished a proud country - the breadbasket of Sothern Africa - within a decade.This rotten regime has been fully exposed in the local & international press. Therefore any investment in Zhimbabwe is to be well avoided.

report this

Andrew Wright

Aug 19, 2010 at 12:46

The quote from the prospectus certainly doesn't inspire confidence.

Clearly Woodford has an amazing track record, but I do wonder whether whatever gains are to be had won't be outweighed by the possible negative publicity around this investment, worse still if anything does go wrong.

report this

james corbett

Aug 19, 2010 at 13:09

Mr Woodford is a very clever and astute person, so you have to give his ideas some serious thought. However, in a country ruled by a despot, who has no regard for the rule of law, and no sense of decency,(I am talking about Zimbabwe, not the UK!) you would have to tread very carefully. It sounds to me like an out and out gamble. We will see.

report this

Crosby Pamberi

Aug 19, 2010 at 13:19

Risks don't come bigger than:

It warns: ‘The company cannot guarantee that it will be permitted to have its investment capital returned outside of Zimbabwe, or converted into its operating currency, US dollars, upon divestment of an interest in a Zimbabwean company.’

Caveat emptor. Enough said.

report this

Dennis .

Aug 19, 2010 at 13:54

I have just run this past my son who has worked in various African countries including Zambia, Congo and Mauretania. His reply included the word "bargepole" about investing anything in Africa having seen the ingrained corruption and lack of work ethic.

report this

Phil Castle

Aug 19, 2010 at 14:03

Would I personally invest anything significant in it? Simple answer NO.

Would I every invest in Z|imbabwe with Mugabe in complete control NO

Would I invest a very small amount in a coalition government with M Changeri involved (my spelling I know) - Maybe.... and that is the current situation.

Looking at the stakes quoted in the article 27% of Massawara valued at 15.5 million, does that mean he's invested £4.1 million? (or about 10 x detached 5 bedroom houses in South East Kent) , against a total portfolio of £16.3 billion.....

report this

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Aug 19, 2010 at 14:12

4.1 million/ 16.3 bill = 0.025% of the portfolio......

report this

snoekie

Aug 19, 2010 at 14:49

Woodford is not naive so I have to ask what assurances has he received and from whom, and was any consideration given?

Yes Zim is a tremendous opportunity, but only after the equivalent of our Mr Brown is removed together with the army and police chiefs and acolytes have been removed from power and influence (legitimately, of course) and law and order restored.

report this

Raz.

Aug 19, 2010 at 15:04

Mugabe is 86 years of age. Zimbabwe will be a different place in 10 years time. When you invest in a fund like this surely it is for the longer term?

report this

Roger Savage

Aug 19, 2010 at 16:17

“It also underscores the region’s reputation as a territory laden with risk and the threat of crime and corruption.” PARDON threat implies it may happen, what you should have said it is full of CRIME and Corruption.

I am utterly amazed anybody would want to invest in that vile man’s country, because anybody who does condone the foul things that creature has and is doing. Please don’t be hypocritical and say it is for the future when M****e has gone, because you are talking about here and now. So I truly hope anyone who invests in these funds loses the lot.

report this

Anonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'

Aug 19, 2010 at 16:22

On an ethical ground I would think strongly about adding to my PLI investment Zimbabwe under Mugabe is trouble I can do without it.

report this

Hotrod

Aug 19, 2010 at 17:23

The saying goes. "Birds of a feather flock together"

Looks like Mr Woodford wants to follow in the footsteps of Nicholas Van Hoogstraten (Adolf Von Hessen) The self styled emissary of Beelzebub.

report this

Anonymous 3 needed this 'off the record'

Aug 19, 2010 at 23:05

I heard tell that Mugabe's personal physician is Woodford's third cousin....clearly this is a case of insider dealing, a punt on M' timely demise;-) A fund like Masawara should swell tenfold in value as soon as the crows flap their wings....shame it's still gonna be only 0.25% of Woodford's AUM.

report this

Rory

Aug 20, 2010 at 07:46

Not only an opportunity to invest in Blood Diamonds, but Blood Gold, blood tobacco, Blood Coal.... And tell me, young Cynthia, how did Daddy make enough dosh to send you to such a posh school?

report this

Anonymous 4 needed this 'off the record'

Aug 20, 2010 at 09:58

Woodfords is beting on the death of that nutter Mudabe, at 86 is tickets up and a few sharp eyed boys can see the next tomorrow. they cannot openly say we are just treading water until this bastards dead, but that is the truth. The fund will be an excellent investment for anyone with a 8/ 10 time frame.

report this

Jill McEvoy

Aug 20, 2010 at 11:16

Look back at Woodford lately not good against others To be this daft he has to have inside knowledge of imminent death

report this

Bill McCormack

Aug 20, 2010 at 11:22

I will think seriously about IP Income fund after reading this.

report this

Bill McCormack

Aug 20, 2010 at 11:23

seriously about selling it that is.

report this

Norman Walford

Aug 20, 2010 at 12:16

Sounds very odd. I read elsewhere about Woodford's possibly unhealthy involvement with Cenkos, the broker which did the Masawara IPO - equally odd. I was at school with Andy Stewart, the founder of Cenkos many years ago (before he was expelled) - an equally dodgy character. (The firm was named after his favourite racehorse). I think some questions need to be answered.

NW

report this

Guy Thompson

Aug 20, 2010 at 13:54

Don't assume that once Mugabe leaves the scene Zimbabwe will suddenly become a great place to invest. Behind the scenes are the thugs who have mastermined the workings of his oppressive regime. They have so much to lose that they have blocked the democratic wishes of the nation over many years. Expect chaos and bloodletting on a massive scale after Mugabe.

report this

Mike1

Aug 22, 2010 at 17:29

Baffling! A slip of the finger on the keyboard or a misplaced click of the mouse or a pub lunch or ....?

report this

jeremy melton

Sep 15, 2010 at 22:27

Woodford has rarely been wrong over time. That is what I invested clients money for (when I worked in the investment industry) and I have no hesitation in backing him now. Africa has a large population with a very low economic base (sound familiar?). The investor makes a personal decision, the fund manager has a a tighter brief.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet