Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a628703
Investors call for BAE bosses to resign
Pressure is growing on BAE's chief executive and chairman as investors campaign for change after the aerospace group's botched attempt at a merger with EADS.
Markets
Shareholders are calling for both the chairman and chief executive of FTSE 100 defence firm BAE Systems (BAES.L) to resign after the group’s botched attempt at a merger with Franco-German rival EADS.
Private investor group ShareSoc today launched a campaign for the two men, Dick Olver and Ian King, to quit after their ‘failure of shareholder engagement’. Separately a trio of big institutional shareholders which between them own 18% of the group have demanded Olver’s resignation in a letter to the board, according to a report in the Financial Times.
BAE Systems' proposed merger with EADS collapsed nearly two weeks ago following intense political and shareholder pressure. Major shareholders, led by Invesco Perpetual's Neil Woodford, voiced their objections to the planned £30 billion deal, while the French, German and British governments jostled for influence over the proposed combined entity.
See our gallery of nine other FTSE 100 companies that have Invesco as a leading shareholder and need to keep Neil Woodford sweet.
Shareholder advisory group Pirc described it as ‘the latest example of deal falling apart amidst shareholder pressure’ of the sort that has scuppered M&A plans from blue chips including Prudential (PRU.L) and G4S (GFS.L).
But shareholders have been punished by the whole saga, with shares dropping by 15% since BAE first announced it was in talks with EADS over a possible merger. Today they are worth 310p.
Please visit our full site to view this interactive chart
Roger Lawson, chairman of ShareSoc commented today: ‘This looks to be a classic case of empire building by corporate management… it was never very clear what benefit BAE shareholders would get from the deal.’
According to the FT report, Invesco and the other two institutional investors criticised BAE’s ‘misguided’ strategy, claiming that Olver and senior independent director Peter Mason had lost credibility with investors.
ShareSoc plans to vote against the re-elction of Olver and King at the company’s AGM in May 2013, unless the two resign before then.
BAE maintains the merger would have represented a good deal for Woodford and other investors and believes it could have eventually proved this to doubting shareholders.
Separate reports have suggested that BAE plans to appease investors by spending the proceeds of a Saudi arms deal on a share buyback.
As well as Invesco, major shareholders in BAE include Franklin Templeton, Legal & General, Blackrock and Fidelity.
Sponsored By:
More about this:
Look up the shares
Look up the fund managers
More from us
More
What others are saying
Archive
Today's articles
Nationwide: we are not the Co-op! by Gavin Lumsden
The Accumulator: 'Reduce bonds, buy Asia' by Gavin Lumsden
The Expert View: Marks & Spencer, Carnival and G4S by Harry Brooks
Wednesday Papers: Dimon wins clear victory to keep both jobs by Himanshu Singh
Overnight Markets: Wall Street advances on Fed officials' reassurance by Himanshu Singh
Tools from Citywire Money
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.







3 comments so far. Why not have your say?
MoneyObserver
Oct 23, 2012 at 13:14
BAe Chairman and Chief Exec. should go immediately.
Then the role of the remaining board members including non-execs needs careful examination, particularly whether any of them was party to the decision to sell the Airbus stake.
report thisMoneyObserver
Oct 23, 2012 at 13:17
Of course Cameron's response to the mergerprposal warrants resignation, but a long list of previous foul ups has not revealed any pre-disposition on his part to ever feel that his continued presence is a part of the problem.
report thisRoger Lawson
Oct 23, 2012 at 17:06
I am not particularly looking forward to being "appeased" as the article suggests because share buy-backs are usually a bad idea and simply enable institutions to get out if they want to - not much benefit to private shareholders who would prefer a tender offer or dividends. Might have to add a campaign against share buy-backs at BAE!
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.