Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a425682
Homeowners must protect themselves against unemployment
How would you pay off your mortgage if you lost your job? Lorna Bourke looks at the help available.
Markets
Homebuyers who lose their jobs face the real possibility of their homes being repossessed as the government moves to cut State benefits.
State help
Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) pays mortgage interest - but not capital repayments - on a home loan of up to £200,000 after 13 weeks of unemployment. SMI currently assumes homebuyers are paying interest on their mortgages at 6.08% - regardless of the actual rate paid. But from October of this year the rate will be based on the Bank of England's published monthly average mortgage interest rate, now 3.65%. The Council of Mortgage Lenders and the Consumer Credit Counselling Service, a debt advisory charity, warn the reduction will result in some recipients losing their homes.
There are, in any case, tough limitations excluding vast numbers of homebuyers from claiming SMI so it would be unwise to rely on this benefit to fund your mortgage should you be made redundant. Most couples won’t qualify because you are ineligible if your partner earns more than approximately £5,000 a year. Anyone with savings of £16,000 or more is also ineligible.
To qualify you must be receiving Income Support, Income Based Job Seekers Allowance, Employment & Support Allowance or Pension Credit. So if you’ve recently lost your job it is important to sign on. Benefit is paid for a maximum of two years. Those most likely to qualify will be single homeowners with little or no savings.
Help yourself
The answer for most homebuyers is to take out Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance (MPPI) – not least of all because many homebuyers have mortgages larger than £200,000. MPPI provides monthly cash sufficient to pay your mortgage or loan repayments in the event that you are made redundant, or are laid off work through sickness. The CML estimates that less than 20% of homebuyers have MPPI cover.
Many homebuyers are reluctant to buy MPPI because of the extra cost and the fact that these policies, usually sold by the mortgage lender, have earned themselves a bad name by association with Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) sold by the banks to cover personal loan repayments and often charged as a lump sum premium up front. Lump sum PPI policies have now been banned.
Bad name
Some MPPI policies have been overpriced and mis-sold to homebuyers who have been unable to make a successful claim because of restrictions contained in the small print. For example, your claim will be rejected if you had been notified that you will be made redundant. Anyone who is self employed cannot claim. You may not be able to claim if you receive redundancy payments from your former employer.
‘MPPI is not for everybody and we believe people should take independent advice,’ says Nel Mooy, managing director of specialist payment protection broker, British Insurance. ‘We have had some standard letters from claims organisations and there seem to be an industry in making claims. This is a pity because it damages the overall reputation of MPPI,’ she says.
But there are many good policies around. With unemployment likely to rise as the government spending cuts start to bite, homebuyers would be wise to consider taking out a policy now – before heavy redundancies are announced and premiums for cover rise. So what cover do you need, how much is it likely to cost and is it worthwhile?
What cover do you need?
The first thing to understand is that there is a difference between Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance (MPPI) and the similar cover called Income Protection Insurance (IP). With MPPI (and PPI cover for personal loans) the benefits are sometimes paid direct to the mortgage lender or to the bank which made the loan and the benefits are not treated as income when people are assessed for means-tested State benefits like income based Job Seekers Allowance or Support for Mortgage Interest. But IP is treated as income and will affect entitlement to State benefits. IP is also taxable but MPPI and PPI are not.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
More from us
- Home repossessions continue to fall - for now
- Lloyds stops selling payment protection insurance policies
- How to avoid getting short changed by your bank
- 10 tips to prepare for redundancy
- Cameron’s Budget cuts: Your 10 point Survival Guide
What others are saying
Archive
Today's articles
- Market Blog: Cape crashes on Algerian profits warning
- Week Ahead: waiting uncomfortably for Greece to leave
- Investment trusts beat unit trusts in emerging markets
- Smart Investor: let the news flow wash over you
- Lyttleton takes summer break from BlackRock funds
- Threadneedle bond boss Fitzsimmons exits
- Friday Papers: Insults fly over troubled HP buyout
- Overnight Markets: US stocks gain as Europe offsets China concern





3 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Chris Clark
Aug 28, 2010 at 11:09
Honestly I do wonder if we'll come to a point where people will ask themselves "Buy a house - Why am I doing this?"
report thisJonathan
Aug 28, 2010 at 11:11
So at the moment someone out of work with a £200,000 mortgage will receive 6.08% for interest payments which is £12,160 per year or over £1000 per month. I know someone who is paying 1% above base rate so on a £200,000 mortgage is £3,000 per year or £250 per month. So in theory they could make £750 profit from the current government payment deal. I'm not surprised the government is having to rethink its give-away mentality. With some people claiming £100,000 housing benefit and some people making a profit from the current government mortgage subsidies, people on £50,000 getting benefits in tax credits. I think we are going to see a few landlords, housing benefit claimants, people on up to £50k per year complaining about the government cuts.
report thisJon Gallagher
Aug 30, 2010 at 19:42
Where do we find the extra income to pay mortgage proterction insurance when we are currently taxed to the hilt and we have little or no money left at the end of each month as it is. If the goverment does not wish to pay the mortgage subsidy then those people who lose their home end up in private rented accomodation and end up claiming more in housing benefits than they would have got under the mortgage subsidy so why do the governenment think they will be saving money by doing this. Also the house they refuse to help the homeowner with ends up being rented out and yes you guessed it more housing benefit to pay. Its a totally false economy and is a prime example which shows us that saving is pointless as you just get penalised for it.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.