Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a405739

Hargreaves calls for £50k cap on annual pension contributions

Hargreaves Lansdown says a £50,000 limit on yearly contributions would match revenue raised by a taper.

Hargreaves calls for £50k cap on annual pension contributions

Hargreaves Lansdown has said the pensions industry ‘unanimously’ supports a £50,000 cap on annual contributions as a more appropriate way for the Treasury to restrict relief.

Next April tax relief on pension contributions will taper to 20% for those earning £180,000 but the move has been opposed by leading pensions figures.

Before the last Budget industry bodies including, Tisa and the Association of British Insurers, lobbied to replace the proposals with a reduction of the annual allowance from £245,000 to £50,000.

‘We conducted an informal survey of the pensions industry, including trade bodies, pensions lawyers, actuaries, fund managers and IFAs,’ said Tom McPhail (pictured), Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research.

‘We asked them which was the more appropriate way to restrict the tax relief of high earners; through Labour’s pension tax, or through a cap on pension contributions. They unanimously opted for the contribution cap.’

Hargreaves used calculations by Legal & General pensions strategy director Adrian Boulding which show the £50,000 cap will raise the same the same amount as the taper.

‘The beast is dead but the tentacles of the former Labour government are still reaching for the private pension system in the form of a monstrously complicated pension tax. Capping pension contributions at £50,000 is a much simpler way to achieve the same goal that has the support of the whole pensions industry,’ said McPhail.

4 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Jun 10, 2010 at 16:05

Why not revert back to the rules as was up until a few years back.

Max contribution as a percentage of NRE, starting at 15%, with that % increasing with age ie say from 50 onwards

report this

Bob

Jun 10, 2010 at 16:45

How on earth is it proposed to tackle the situation where high earners (like a number of civil servants) belong to a non contributory pension scheme? How does one tax the value of a pay rise of, say, £6000 pa which brings in its wake an addition to pension in due course of £4000 pa?

report this

Anonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'

Jun 10, 2010 at 17:14

An excellent proposal from Hargreaves Lansdown. except that I would limit the figure to 25,000.pounds. Brown's preference for complictions was the main reason for voting against him, the other one being the Iraq/ Afghanistan sculduggery which he fully supported.

report this

Chris Sullivan

Jun 17, 2010 at 11:02

I run my own small business and put in a limited amoun to personal pensions becuase that is all I can afford each year. Of course if I get a really good year and have a lump sum in the company I will want to put it aside for my pension. Why should I be limited in my ability to catch up in any one year when others are being given generous payouts every year from their regular jobs?

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet