Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a626489
Finding Nimmo: the best way to a fund manager ...
... is through his investment trust. We look at the case of Harry Nimmo, the top smaller companies fund manager at Standard Life.
Markets
Be it a lack of publicity, complicated structure or overly technical language, whatever the reasons are investment trusts aren’t as popular as open-ended funds among private investors.
But gearing, or borrowing, can give investment trusts a distinct advantage over their open-ended investment companies or unit trusts in rising markets and result in better returns over the long term.
Take the example of Harry Nimmo, the highly regarded smaller companies fund manager at Standard Life Investments. There was some disappointment in early 2011 when SLI decided to 'soft close' his Standard Life Investments UK Smaller Companies fund (this means they hiked the initial charge and stopped paying commission to advisers who recommended the fund to investors).
The fund had grown to more than £1 billion over its 14 years' life, an unwieldy size for a smaller companies fund, reflecting the demand from investors keen to reap the returns being generated by Nimmo, currently AA-rated by Citywire. The fund is also a pick of our Citywire Selection team.
It would be interesting to know how many of those investors who were subsequently advised to switch out of the fund moved into the Standard Life UK Smaller Companies investment trust, which doesn't pay commision but which Nimmo also run and which has produced even better returns.
Investment trust storms ahead
Shareholders in Standard Life UK Smaller Companies have enjoyed a 21% total return over the past year, while the fund has generated just 13%.
The investment trust was taken over by Nimmo in 2003 and was previously called the Edinburgh Small Companies trust. Although the open-ended fund attracted over £1.5 billion in funds at its peak, the trust is now just £177 million in size, reflecting its 'closed-ended' (limited number of shares in issue) structure.
‘When we took it on it was a trust in difficulties, with a discount of 35%-40%. Now it’s at a 4% premium and in the last few days we have issued £750,000 worth of shares,' Nimmo said.
‘I do like investment trusts and what you do benefit from is gearing. In a rising market you get the added part of being geared. That has meant that our trust has performed better than the open-ended fund and gearing is the main factor. Gearing is at about 10%, and this year has been a great year for smaller companies.’
He says that small companies are unnecessarily characterised as more risky. ‘If you can deal with equity risk in large caps, you can deal with our level of equity risk. I can only remember one company ever cutting its dividend in our portfolio in 2008, and no company has ever gone bust.’
For more on the pros and cons of investment trusts watch this video from The Lolly Investor Programme
Top holdings in the fund and trust
The fund and trust have similar investments, and feature ASOS (ASOS.L), Paddy Power (PAP.L) and Rightmove (RMV.L) in their top holdings.
‘We run our winners and cut our losers. Money in the longer term is made in smaller companies and holding them for long periods. I’m absolutely convinced of that,' he said.
‘ASOS we’ve owned since 2006 and the price we paid was 85p. The shares are now at £23.11, and we had to sell some recently, and it looked to me that we’d made 15 times our money on that stock.
‘Paddy Power is nearly as good, Rightmove is probably about four times earnings, and Hargreaves Lansdown (HL.L) is about the same.’
Following the sale of Cove Energy, which Nimmo tripled his money on, he has bought some fresh stocks into the fund such as fashion brand Ted Baker (TED.L) and healthcare software business EMIS (EMIS.L).
‘The internet has changed the way business is done and it has meant that new companies can come through and steal business from established players as they’re quicker to adapt. Ted Baker is a good example of that, and it has made a breakthrough in America and certain European markets and is looking at the Far East, but it’s still quite a small company.
‘EMIS is the GPs' software for electronic patient records, and they have about 55% of the UK market. We think they are going to make inroads to the NHS services.’
SuperGroup sold off
However, there have been a few companies Nimmo has had to sell, mostly due to their size, including First Quantum (FM.L) and Spirax Sarco (SPX.L). He also opted out of Supergroup (SGP.L) last year just before its string of profit warnings.
Nimmo explains: ‘We bought it as I met Julian Dunkerton, the chief executive, who was very impressive and he had built the company up from a market stall. But we felt it was growing too quickly, and as a company grows the infrastructure of the business has to keep up. It had sort of a scattergun type of approach to growth.
‘We also felt the wrong sort of people were starting to wear the brand, almost like the Burberry effect, and wondered if it was becoming overexposed so we sold the shares.’
Long-term returns
Although the investment trust was in recovery mode when it was first taken on by Nimmo 10 years ago, a look at the longer-term returns shows a similar picture, with the trust outperforming the fund.
Over the longer term the Standard Life Investments UK Smaller Companies fund has generated a total return of 45% over the past five years to the end of September, compared with the Numis Smaller Companies index's total return of 27.6%.
However, the investment trust’s share price has raced ahead to give total returns of 122% over the past five years, and its net asset value (NAV) total returns increased 75% in the same period.
Sponsored By:
More about this:
Look up the funds
Look up the shares
- Paddy Power PLC (PAP.L)
- Asos PLC (ASOS.L)
- Rightmove PLC (RMV.L)
- Hargreaves Lansdown PLC (HRGV.L)
- Ted Baker PLC (TED.L)
- EMIS Group PLC (EMISG.L)
- First Quantum Minerals Ltd (FQM.L)
- Spirax-Sarco Engineering PLC (SPX.L)
- SuperGroup PLC (SGP.L)
Look up the investment trusts
Look up the fund managers
More from us
- The Lolly Investor Programme: a video guide to investing
- Confident Nimmo keeps cash low, profits from Cove sell
- Harry Nimmo: how I'm playing the market rally
- Harry Nimmo on the launch of his global fund
- Citywire Selection: best investment funds
Archive
Today's articles
A new look at fund charges and why they matter by Gavin Lumsden
Week Ahead: the conundrum behind the rally by Chris Marshall
Friday Five: times when you need financial advice by Michelle McGagh
Gold heads for 7th down day while FTSE stalls by Chris Marshall
Saturday Papers: Backlash to hit scandal-tainted City by Himanshu Singh
Tools from Citywire Money
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
Read more...
A new look at fund charges and why they matter
by Gavin Lumsden on May 17, 2013 at 13:49







11 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Tim Stevens
Oct 17, 2012 at 13:22
I nearly bought this trust in the summer of 2011. Interesting to note I'd still be nursing a loss if I had...
report thisMaverick
Oct 17, 2012 at 15:05
Tim - Buy it, monitor it, sell it if it stops performing, then buy it back again when it recovers (as I did). It's still beaten the FTSE All-Share in 40 of the last 60 months.
I can't see why people quote Net Asset Value figures for investment trusts. You can't buy its Net Asset Value even if you want to. On the other hand, I think I'd prefer 122% over 5 years to 75% . . . . .
report thisTim Stevens
Oct 17, 2012 at 16:04
I agree Maverick, I was just pointing out how this one has missed the market rally. I'm quite surprised by that, as most small cap funds have recovered and then some.
report thisNGR
Oct 17, 2012 at 16:04
Tim, I bought it in summer last year (16th August) and am 11.47% up. I continued to buy each month til February of this year, and am in profit on all of the buys - the best being 16th December 2011 - it's up 31.43% since then.
I do think that in volatile or uncertain markets, buying monthly makes more sense than investing a lump sum.
report thisTJL
Oct 17, 2012 at 17:41
I bought in a couple of days ago after considering the alternatives - here's hoping I made a good choice.
Regards
Another Tim (this could get confusing).
report thisBONZO
Oct 17, 2012 at 21:10
Have transferred 2 ISAs to Standard Life in the past 2 years. BOTH required numerous letters and 'phone calls to obtain relevant Contract Notes, although assured after first incompetent administration, situation corrected.
First error resolved very competently and with acceptable recompense.
Second instance - this year - complete opposite, excuses, delays in answering and latest letter offering only recourse to Ombudsman.
Investment Management very acceptable. Administration incompetent, lamentable and wholly frustrating. Be warned.
report thisMaverick
Oct 18, 2012 at 09:00
Bonzo - All large financial institutions have rubbish administration. I have personal experience of Aviva for pension scheme administration and Santander for bank accounts.
I don't think we ought to tar Harry Nimmo with a brush from an entirely different area of the Standard Life behemoth.
report thisBONZO
Oct 18, 2012 at 09:45
MAVERICK, please note did not castigate Mr Nimmo. I purposely stated "Investment Management very acceptable. ".
Wholly agree re your comments on their Admin - hence my original message. The more we Investors of all levels publically complain, the sooner they might improve or hopefully, be forced to by the Authorities - new format(s) ???
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD VIA EVERY CHANNEL
report thiskp
Oct 18, 2012 at 21:35
Why does the isa unit tust not math he inv trust
Must surely hold the same funds
Are usa nit trust just a waste then
report thisMaverick
Oct 19, 2012 at 09:33
kp - The article explains why, but the quick answer is yes.
Independent financial advisers have been pushing unit trusts for decades because they pay (or used to pay) commission, and investment trusts generally don't.
Nowadays when you can call up free information on the web from Trustnet or other similar sites, you can make up your own mind which is better.
report thisNGR
Oct 19, 2012 at 11:38
I'd agree with Maverick. Unit Trusts have been pushed because they pay commission, even though investment trusts (which don't pay commission) often perform better (though are often more volatile). The RDR which is happening I think next year may result in unit trusts being less heavily promoted as they will no longer be able to pay commission.
I have to say that I tend to prefer investment trusts, and it is relatively easy to find good investment trusts which have consistently outperformed their index. I have a couple of unit trusts, but, generally, I've found it harder to find good unit trusts which have outperformed their index. As Maverick says though, there are sites out there where you can easily compare the performance of various investment vehicles, and then make up your own mind.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.