Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a503845
Fears for property market as lenders restrict mortgage mobility
Borrowers are increasingly finding that their requests to transfer mortgages when they move are being refused by lenders.
Markets
Borrowers are increasingly finding that their requests to transfer mortgages when they move are being refused by lenders, sparking fears among property experts that the market is set to slow further.
Tight lenders
The mortgage market is in real danger of stagnating because of lenders' restrictive affordability requirements and their desire to get rid of unprofitable business.
Homebuyers are finding it increasingly difficult to ‘port’ their mortgages to new properties as banks and building societies tighten their lending criteria. In some cases the requirements are so tight that homeowners just give up trying to move, which means that the market is in serious danger of stagnating.
Some of the worst hit are those homebuyers on interest-only deals and older borrowers, many of whom do not want to increase the size of their mortgages, but are being refused permission to transfer an existing mortgage to a new home on the grounds that the loan, which they have often been paying for years, is no longer ‘affordable’.
Age restrictions
'Most lenders will not lend more than 75% on an interest-only basis. But we have had clients who wanted much lower loans to value – in some cases less than 50% – with no increase in the amount borrowed and they still failed to qualify to port their mortgage to a new property,' said Ray Boulger of mortgage broker John Charcol. ‘We have had clients just decide to stay put.’
The number of interest-only deals on offer has reduced dramatically as the regulator considers this risky lending. Boulger points out that those offering interest-only deals, now calculate affordability based on the higher repayment costs, and will only lend to age 65.
This means that many people over the age of 45 cannot meet the affordability criteria because repayments are calculated over a relatively short term and are therefore higher. A 50 year-old wanting to move house will be assessed for affordability on a repayment loan over 15 years, not 25, which significantly increases the monthly costs and will prevent many from moving house.
'For anybody over the age of 45 it starts to be an issue,' he said. Given that many people do not even buy their first property until they are in their mid to late 30s and that we will soon all have to consider working until age 70, these age restrictions are likely to become increasingly onerous.
Porting complaints
In its recent annual report, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) reported an increase in the incidence of complaints about ‘porting’ mortgages. Many homebuyers assume that if their mortgage is portable, they will automatically be able to switch it to a new property when they want to move house.
This is not the case. Lenders reserve the right to ‘underwrite’ the loan again and are imposing increasingly tough criteria when people want to move house. In some cases lenders are insisting that borrowers whose income has not changed can no longer afford mortgages that they already have.
Inevitably, it raises the question as to whether these tougher conditions are aimed at getting rid of customers on low rate mortgages that are unprofitable for lenders. Before the credit crunch it was possible to sign up for tracker loans at sub-base rate levels or 1% above UK base rate. Some were lifetime trackers. Clearly borrowers do not want to give up these cheap loans. Equally lenders want them to take their business elsewhere so that they can lend the money more profitably.
The FOS’ recently published annual review for the year to 31 March, reveals that the ombudsman has seen an increase in the number of complaints from consumers whose applications to transfer mortgages have been turned down.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
More from us
- Monday Papers: Lloyds has most risky loans; 'Economic growth must slow'
- Houses are simply too expensive for the young
- Fixed rate mortgages: wait and see what happens to five-year rates
What others are saying
Archive
Today's articles
- Market Blog: Bargain hunters maintain upper hand on FTSE
- Asset allocation: where bonds fit in to the big picture
- The Expert View: Mothercare, Burberry and Moss Bros
- Friday Papers: Insults fly over troubled HP buyout
- Overnight Markets: US stocks gain as Europe offsets China concern
- Citywire Top Stocks Daily News Digest
- Market Blog: bargain hunters drive FTSE to strong finish
- Why ‘free’ banking is a dangerous myth





6 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Samantha Vickers
Jul 01, 2011 at 11:46
It seems that we are seeing more and more of this sort of thing where banks are restricting the supply of mortgage credit by one ruse or another. It does suggest it will continue to be a difficult year for both the mortgage and housing market.
I have to give a hat tip to the article I read towards the end of last year as it foreshadowed what is actually happened since.
"The Bank of England will make it harder to get a mortgage in 2011"
http://www.mindfulmoney.co.uk/2732/economic-impact/the-bank-of-england-will-make-it-harder-to-get-a-mortgage-in-2011.html
It is the Bank of England which is causing much of this as our banks respond to the cash squeeze which has been put on them.
report thisAl
Jul 01, 2011 at 12:37
Yep the financial sector demands its entitlement to screw you over every which way possible - Charcol included - I asked them once to get me their best deal which a) couldn't beat what I could get off many high street sources b) they wanted to charge a "heavily discounted" 5 figure sum to make it happen.
report thisJohn Lacy
Jul 01, 2011 at 12:41
It sometimes gets even more crazy than this.
I've just had Santander turn down a client downsizing and wanting to reduce their mortgage from £138,500 to £60,000 as it didn't meet their affordability calculation. The client's circumstances hadn't changed for the worse!!!!
report thisSteven22
Jul 01, 2011 at 14:28
We clearly needs our banks to be less leveraged - unfortunately, this also means we need mortgage borrowers to be less leveraged. Think strict 3x salary is the way to go.
report thisJonathan
Jul 01, 2011 at 20:36
As there are a massive number of mortgages that were fraudulently taken out from 2002 to 2009 with people overstating their income and overpaying for their property, a lot of them can't move because lenders are requiring some sort of proof of income and more careful property valuation checks.
report thisRoberto Birquet
Jul 01, 2011 at 21:04
Steven22
Problem is Steven, that would lower house prices. And Western civilisation just won't stand that. So your taxes, your pension, your savings will go to bail out the banks, as they have done again (What, did you believe they were bailing out Greece? Ha ha).
Public sector pesnsions are actually becoming more affordable. But we have bankers' bills to pay. So we bail out Lloyds, Northern Rock, Bradford and Bingley, RBS, Greece, Ireland yada yada. And what for? To keep house prices high, and impoverish the next generation. But as long as Western Civilisation aka the banks, high finance, the TV porn industry, survives; it's worth it.
so rollup, rollup, and either save £80K for a deposit, or impoverish your parents, who are worrying about care homes, or get ready for housing benefit in your old age. How on Earth can this go on?
Who cares, as long as we get a few more rolls of the dice.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.