Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a414419
Exchange traded funds face income tax alert
Take care if you invest in exchange traded funds outside the tax ‘wrapper’ of an ISA (individual savings account) or Sipp (self-invested personal pension). You may be liable for a higher tax rate on your investment gains than you thought.
Markets
Take care if you invest in exchange traded funds outside the tax ‘wrapper’ of an ISA (individual savings account) or Sipp (self-invested personal pension) as you may be liable for a higher tax rate on your investment gains than you thought.
Lack of 'distributor' status
A new report has revealed that a quarter of all UK-listed ETFs do not have ‘reporting’ or ‘distributor’ status with the tax authorities. As a result any gains are liable to be taxed at the income tax rate of up to 50%, rather than the lower capital gains rates of either 18% or 28%.
ETF providers such as iShares, db x-trackers and Lyxor are rushing to apply for the status for their funds that do not have it.
Nevertheless, the revelation has opened a can of worms for some investors who bought ETFs outside the tax shelters of ISAs and Sipps.
Investors could face HMRC penalty

Deborah Fuhr, global head of ETF research at investment group BlackRock (above), says such investors have two choices.
- they can do nothing, which would mean once they have disposed of the ETF they would be liable to income tax on the whole lot.
- or, they can elect on their tax return for a ‘deemed disposal and reacquisition of the holding at the time the UK reporting status starts’, meaning they will only be charged income tax for the period before the ETF acquired reporting status.
Unfortunately, the oversight means investors may have unknowingly – and wrongly – paid CGT tax on their gains when it should have been subject to income tax.
Under HMRC regulation, investors who paid CGT on gains from non-distributor funds would have to repay the difference, which could amount to as much as 28% extra.
However, if they are shown to have not taken reasonable care with their tax returns, they could be thumped with an additional 30% penalty.
Setback to ETF appeal

Edward Allen, a partner at Thurleigh Investment Managers in London (above), said the issue was a headache for investors. ‘It’s really not advertised well enough. It’s interesting that people are picking up on it this and hopefully a bit of publicity will make investors more aware of the issue.’
The potential tax hike is a blow for investors who have been drawn to ETFs by their low costs and flexibility. The BlackRock study showed ETFS charge 0.42% a year, up to 1% cheaper than actively managed unit trusts. ETFs offer access to all the main stock markets in the world as well as a host of commodities and specialist sectors.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
More from us
What others are saying
Archive
Today's articles
- Market Blog: Bargain hunters maintain upper hand on FTSE
- Asset allocation: where bonds fit in to the big picture
- The Expert View: Mothercare, Burberry and Moss Bros
- Friday Papers: Insults fly over troubled HP buyout
- Overnight Markets: US stocks gain as Europe offsets China concern
- Citywire Top Stocks Daily News Digest
- Market Blog: bargain hunters drive FTSE to strong finish
- Why ‘free’ banking is a dangerous myth





6 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Jul 18, 2010 at 13:04
Does that also mean that loses in an ETF can be offset against Income Tax?
Sounds complicated does it not?
report thisDrazen Jorgic
Jul 19, 2010 at 09:17
Hi Anonymous 1,
Basically, the tax treatment depends on an individual’s tax situation and the kind of ETF an investor owns.
For ETFs which have UK ‘distributor’ or UK ‘reporting’ status, meaning they are liable to capital gains rather than income tax on profits, any losses can be offset against CGT.
However, ETFs which do not have UK distributor or UK reporting status, and are thus liable to income tax, losses can also be offset against capital gains tax but not against income tax.
David Willcox, an investment director at City Asset Management, says: ‘It’s a common perception that you can offset losses from non-distributor ETFs against income tax but you can not. It’s not an ideal situation, tax wise.’
Some tax experts have said the taxation of non-distributor funds is one of the worst possible structures, though the aim is to encourage investors to buy ETFs with UK reporting or UK distributor status.
report thisniblick
Jul 19, 2010 at 09:39
Is there an alternative view to that of David Wilcox? Surely most tax law has a reciprocal balance. If gains within an ETF are deemed to be incremental income, then surely losses must be treated in the same way? If this is the case, then higher rate ETF holders would be wise to crystallise losses now before any change in status makes the losses les valuable from a tax avoidance viewpoint.
report thisAnonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Jul 19, 2010 at 11:45
Drazen
Thank you for your obsevations
Anonymous 1
report thisAnonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'
Jul 19, 2010 at 21:04
So reporting status is for offshore accumulators and distributor status is for offshore income generating funds?
report thisAnonymous 3 needed this 'off the record'
Sep 15, 2010 at 16:28
Anonymous 2 I HOPE is not and advisor if s/he is so lacking in knowledge. Both are for income and accumulating products, offshore-domiciled, but which are sold into the UK. Reporting status is the replacement regime for distributor status. They essentially mean an offshore fund is treated as equivalent to a UK domiciled product from a tax prespective.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.