Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a411079
EU set to clampdown on bankers' bonuses
The European Union is set to pass legislation that could restrict the cash element of bonuses to just 20%
Markets
The European Union’s member states look set to back the toughest restrictions yet on bankers’ bonuses.
According to reports in the Financial Times, Brussels lawmakers are expected to pass legislation that would force 40%-60% of bonuses to be deferred for three to five years and half the upfront bonus would have to be paid in shares or other securities linked to the institution’s performance.
This would restrict the cash element of the bonus to just 20%-30%. Member nations will have a degree of discretion in how the rules are enforced but the G20 communique and Basel agreements stress the importance of all of the major financial centres acting in a ‘co-ordinated manner.’
One of the main aims of the legislation is to link bonuses more closely to salary in a move that the EU hopes will reduce the incentive to take risks to ensure a large payout.
Angela Knight, chief executive of the British Bankers’ Association (pictured), said: ‘The majority of the remuneration proposals agreed in Europe were implemented in the UK last year - that is in 2009. In fact the UK was the only country that took these steps and so the main consequence of this European decision is that other European countries will now have to follow suit.
‘There is always more to be done but all politicians, whatever their party, must remember two things: the first is the extent of the changes that have been made by the UK and by UK quartered banks; and second that banking is an international and mobile business.
‘While agreeing the importance of getting the pay and bonus structures right, it is essential that these facts - and particularly the pay rules that have already been applied here - should take priority over a short term political soundbite.’
Tools from Citywire Money
Today's articles
- Market Blog: Bargain hunters maintain upper hand on FTSE
- Asset allocation: where bonds fit in to the big picture
- The Expert View: Mothercare, Burberry and Moss Bros
- Friday Papers: Insults fly over troubled HP buyout
- Overnight Markets: US stocks gain as Europe offsets China concern
- Citywire Top Stocks Daily News Digest
- Market Blog: bargain hunters drive FTSE to strong finish
- Why ‘free’ banking is a dangerous myth





3 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Ron Ball
Jul 01, 2010 at 10:47
So, what difference is this going to make? None is the answer. So some money is deferred and some is paid in shares. What about the basic salaries? I assume that these will go up to compensate for any short term hardship that millionaire bankers could suffer. If the bank has to be bailed out again by taxpayers, will the bankers be paid their deferred bonuses because it was written into their employment contracts? If Angela Knight is happy, it can't be very good for the rest of us.
When will somebody do something about the fact that they are just paid far, far too much?
report thissnoekie
Jul 01, 2010 at 16:59
cash element, restricting bonuses, 20-30% of what?
Limit of 10% of salary (shares and cash), and even those salaries (in the main) are excessively high.
They continue to get bonuses even though they (most of them) were the cause of a huge loss of value, and nary a whisper of clawback for the losses caused.
Is that like allowing the fox back into the hen house, when restocked, after it wantonly slaughtered the egg producers?
report thissnoekie
Jul 01, 2010 at 17:00
Should not the fox have forfeited its life for the killings it committed, rather than being allowed time and again to slaughter, carrying away the odd morsel to live on?
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.