Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a609249
Ethical investor eschews oil, tobacco and mining to beat FTSE
Despite ruling out many of the FTSE 100 heavyweights, Susan Round, manager of the Ecclesiastical Amity UK fund, has beaten her benchmark over the past three years.
Markets
Ethical investing can mean leaner pickings among the FTSE 100 index, as a number of sectors fail to meet ethical, green and social criteria. But fund manager Susan Round, who runs an ethical fund at Ecclesiastical, says she has no problem finding stocks to invest in despite ruling out 40% of the FTSE 100 index before she has even started looking.
‘We’re not including oil, tobacco, or mining… though we have a preference for value-orientated stocks. We have quite a large exposure to healthcare and pharma, which are areas that meet our screening analysis and provide some stability during periods of volatility,’ She says.
Round manages the Ecclesiastical Amity UK fund and was a Citywire A-rated manager in June and April of this year.
‘If you look at the split between mid- and large-cap you’ll most likely see there’s a bigger proportion of mid-cap stocks in this fund. Approximately 40% is invested in FTSE 100 stocks with the bigger part in mid-cap, that’s where we think the opportunities lie,’ she adds.
The exclusion of a large part of FTSE 100 stocks comes down to the ethical screening process put in place by Ecclesiastical fund management.
‘The fund operates both negative and positive screening, which means we have a range of things that we exclude, which include alcohol, tobacco, gambling and arms. But in applying a negative screen it’s also important to try and capture positive aspects.
‘We try to choose companies that have produced a positive contribution either through the way they run their business with community involvement, good corporate governance, labour relations or producing products that are beneficial to the environment.’
The fund has given a total return of 58.7% over the past three years, outperforming the FTSE All Share index's total return of 47.4%. Round says mid-cap and defensive stocks have been the biggest contributors to the fund.
‘The largest contribution has been from the mid cap sector and that would include Oxford Instruments (OXIG.L) and Dunelm (DNLM.L).
‘Dunelm is an out-of-town retailer of household goods and bedding. It’s a relatively new company in the sense that it has only been around four or five years. It’s a very attractive business model and fundamentally it is a well-managed business and has been a very good performer.
‘We’ve also had a good contribution from healthcare with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK.L), which has been one of our top contributors that we’ve held for a long time. Dechra (DECP.L) is an animal pharmaceuticals company and is well-run company with potential for growth.’
Although Round says although she has no problems finding ethically sound large- and mid-cap companies to invest in, the portfolio currently has a cash holding of 12.3%.
Sponsored By:
More about this:
Look up the funds
Look up the shares
- GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK.L)
- Dunelm Group PLC (DNLM.L)
- Oxford Instruments PLC (OXIG.L)
- Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC (DECP.L)
Look up the fund managers
More from us
Archive
Today's articles
Investors race to grab unregulated Jockey bond by Michelle McGagh
Small stock-picking trust generates big returns by James Carthew
Newcastle woos regular savers with 3% ISA by Michelle McGagh
FTSE extends highs as Easyjet soars by Gavin Lumsden
The Expert View: Babcock, Petrofac and Pearson by Chris Marshall
Tools from Citywire Money
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.






2 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Roger Savage
Aug 07, 2012 at 16:13
Oh pass the sickbag...
Ethics has nothing to do with sectors. Just because a non-oil company is seen to get involved with the local community doesn't mean it's ethical. It's all PR and spin. Anyone with half a brain will know that many companies couldn't give a stuff about the local community they operate in - they're there to make money. Any pretence that they're interested is just a marketing exercise.
It's actually more dishonest to appear you're interested in the local community that you otherwise rip off. This happens with supermarkets (including their treatment of suppliers). Fact.
Buidling a play park for the local community doesn't atone for that really...
Also, to believe pharmaceutical companies are ethical is actually quite amazing.
Far from being ethical, the business and political world seems more crooked than ever to me - with politicans and companies seeking to greenwash or create a veneer of ethicalness to hide what they're really up to.
report thiscolin wilson
Aug 07, 2012 at 20:46
Too blinkered these ethical funds, I can't believe that any serious investor would put money into them. They certainly need to carry a wealth warning.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.