Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a536045

Credit Suisse fined £6m for structured product failings

Credit Suisse has been fined £5.95 million by the FSA for mis-selling complex structured products to its UK customers.

Credit Suisse fined £6m for structured product failings

Credit Suisse has been fined £5.95 million by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for mis-selling complex structured products to its UK customers.

Between January 2007 and December 2009 Credit Suisse customers invested over £1 billion in SCARPS – structured capital at risk products. The total value of capital losses suffered as a result of these investments is estimated to be £198.2 million.

The FSA said that Credit Suisse’s private bank failed to make sure that the investment product was suitable for customers and failed to monitor staff to ensure they took reasonable care when giving advice.

SCARPs are complex financial products that are designed to provide an enhanced level of income to customers, but if the index or other asset to which the product is linked falls below a set threshold the investor can lose part or all of their initial income.

It is for this reason that when recommending a SCARP it so important banks ensure customers fully understand the risks involved with this type of investment. Consumer groups have long campaigned that this is not always the case and earlier this year an FSA review identified ‘significant and widespread failings’ among wealth management firms.

According to the FSA, Credit Suisse UK had poor systems and controls in place and failed to maintain adequate records regarding its advice on these products. 'As a result, customers were exposed to an unacceptable risk of being sold a SCARP that was unsuitable for them’.

‘The total value of capital losses suffered by Credit Suisse UK’s customers as a result of investments in SCARPs was estimated at £198.2 million,’ the FSA said. Though, the FSA stressed that these losses occurred at a time of ‘unprecedented turmoil’ in the financial markets.

Tracey McDermott, the FSA's acting director of enforcement and financial crime, said: ‘We have seen all too frequently the consequences of financial services firms failing to implement proper systems and controls to ensure their customers invest in suitable products’. 

‘This penalty should leave firms in no doubt about our determination to make that happen,’ she added.

The £5.95 million penalty the third largest fine dealt out by the FSA this year, and the largest ever for this type of failing. 

Credit Suisse UK has since made a number of improvements to its advisory processes and enhanced its systems and controls. By agreeing to settle at an early stage the investment bank benefited from a 30% discount on its fine.

Credit Suisse will pay redress to customers who were advised to purchase an unsuitable product to ensure that they do not suffer financially as a result, the FSA added

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

5 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Oct 25, 2011 at 15:19

Amazing !

Credit Suisse miss sell a "Capital At Risk"(High Risk )product and get hammered by the FSA.

Capita sell "Cautious/Absolute Return / low Risk" (Arch Cru) products that go belly up and cost Pensioners circa half the money entrusted to them ( even after a so called "compensation deal") but do not even get a slap on the wrist from the FSA ------

Justice ?

report this

Missold Investor

Oct 25, 2011 at 19:28

This figure (£198m capital losses) is almost twice as much as the Lehman-related losses from UK plans sold by NDFA, DRL, ARC and METEOR in 2007/8. Does anyone know how the losses occurred? Was it the counterparty risk or the index risk that got them?

report this

Franco

Oct 25, 2011 at 20:04

Good Lord ! At this rate before long. the only way left for pin striped crooks to make a killing will be unit trusts.

report this

Dunney

Oct 25, 2011 at 20:11

And the £6m goes to the FSCS? I don't think so. Just an nice earner for the unaccountable inconsistent regulator.

report this

John Thorley

Nov 07, 2011 at 11:40

Don't really understand why investors should get compensation at all.

You should know not to listen to an IFA, they have a vested interest in selling the product just like a double glazing salesmen at your door. Read the brochure the risks are in there. If you cannot be bothered to read it don't invest or at least don't complain if you lose your money.

If an accountant gets your tax wrong YOU are liable to HMRC for the fine/interest not the accountant so why should you get 'let off' and compensated if youy gamble/invest your money and you lose it?

We live in a mad compensation culture era. I spend ages reading all the T & Cs of products and investments and then thinking hard about if I should take on those risks or not. Others go in with a completely apathetic attitude dont read anything and when they lose get compensated. Who are we going to compensate next casino gamblers! 'Oh it came up black and I was on read can I have my money back please? I didn't think that could happen.'

If you gamble and you lose take it like a man!

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet