Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a430092
Banks buoyed by Basel deal on reserves
Banking shares advance as regulators confirm the new levels of reserves that banks will have to maintain in order to help prevent another financial crisis.
Markets
Banking shares advance as regulators confirm the new levels of reserves that banks will have to maintain in order to help prevent another financial crisis.
Most banks have already done enough to meet new rules and everyone has been given until 2019 to comply - much longer than anyone had expected.
One London based trader at a large investment bank said the new rules were 'within the range of expectations and provide certainty for banks going forward. UK banks will remain positive as most will already comply with the new regulations.'
Royal Bank of Scotland shares gained 1.4p, or 2.84%, to 49.91p and shares in Lloyds added 1.6p or 2.16%, at 77.25p - both above the price the taxpayer paid for the shares when the pair was bailed out.
HSBC shares advanced 9.1p to 670p.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision said on Sunday night banks need to hold 7% in reserve, nearly twice what they were expected to hold under previous rules.
The new requirements - which form part of the so-called Basel III rules - are meant to ensure that banks minimise the risks they take or store more capital to help limit the impact on the society at large of building up risky businesses.
The new rules also say banks should hold an extra 'capital conservation buffer' which they can dip into at times of need. If they do the banks will have to stop paying dividends and discretionary bonuses.
There is also provision in the rules for national regulators to demand an extra amount is set aside by each bank if the industry as a whole in its country is taking on more risk.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
Look up the shares
Archive
Today's articles
- Market Blog: Cape crashes on Algerian profits warning
- Investment trusts beat unit trusts in emerging markets
- Smart Investor: let the news flow wash over you
- Asset allocation: where bonds fit in to the big picture
- Threadneedle bond boss Fitzsimmons exits
- Friday Papers: Insults fly over troubled HP buyout
- Overnight Markets: US stocks gain as Europe offsets China concern
- The Expert View: Mothercare, Burberry and Moss Bros





6 comments so far. Why not have your say?
martin davis
Sep 13, 2010 at 11:06
All this is really nice to hear. I am pleased for the banking sector, who are able to comply through this financiual crisis, (who they instigated anyway) who have refused to lend to anyone who hasnt got a 25- 40% deposit, who they deem too risky to lend to, or simply dont like!
If you are fortunate to be granted a loanor mortgage from a bank, then they can offer you expensive base rates to deter you, All is rosey for the bans nowadays. Us poor people who helped to bail out the banks arent so lucky. Next thing on the banking sector s will be bonuses and pay award increases.
Just a quick question, who does actually run this country, the coalition governmant, or the banking sector??
I would ask my senior manager to perform an action, but I would TELL my subordiantes to do the same action.. Are the govenment meekely ASKING the banks to lend more money, or are they TELLING them to lend!!????
And finally, what powers do the governments have to enforce this action on the banks????
Sleep well.
report thisDavid Evershed
Sep 13, 2010 at 12:07
Targeting the amount of lending is the worst thing a bank can do.
A bank should set the criteria for risk and lend to those who pass and not lend to those who don't.
Banks who pay staff bonuses for meeting lending targets are asking for trouble since staff will be incentivised to manipulate procedures to allow loans to be agreed that should be turned down.
There are countless examples of the price banks pay in bad debts for having incentivised lending targets a year or two earlier.
report thisjoe stalin
Sep 13, 2010 at 13:19
So we have new rules for captal adequacy-good so they stuck it to the banks. Well lets not forget that the so called financial crisis we have just been through was created by the US investment banks notably Goldmans who piled a small amount of knowingly dodgy stuff into some good quality stuff with the connivance of the rating agencies who were paid to give a top investment grade rating. The media-fuelled panic we saw a couple of years ago led to the market writing down the value of these bands to near zero. Of course this was sheer nonsense but hey who can be rational when someone shouts "fire" in a crowded cinema and all the doors are locked. Asset values are recovering and will continue to do so despite the financial media's best efforts to keep pumping the lame nonsense put out by by the long bond funds such as Pimco. There would not have been a run on a bank if Peston and the BBC had'n't triggred one on Northern Rock. Sure we have a bit of dip but then its not surprising when all you hear day in day out is that we are heading for financial armageddon. Its time to move on and stop knocking the banks and tieing them up with more and more red tape. Lets hang on to what we have left in terms of banking whilst we still have it and not be told what is good for the UK by some goon in Frankfurt. Time to round up the nutters and put them back in the asylum. Is anybody out there still afraid to buy the UK's banks?
report thisallan c
Sep 13, 2010 at 13:33
one way or another the banks will raise intrest rates on loans and mortgages to feather there nests while still paying very little to the depositers of this world..
they borrow at very low rates from the bank of england and lend at high rates.where i agree this is the way banks are supposed to operate..there seems no end of the ways they will try to grab you money by stealth in some cases,
take from the rich to give to the poor more a... take from the poor to give to the rich.
report thismartin davis
Sep 13, 2010 at 13:34
Hi Jo and David, both very good points. Joe,, you havent invested alot of money into the banks have you by chance????
report thisjoe stalin
Sep 13, 2010 at 13:56
Hey Martin :-) of course you are spot on! But then I have never said anytthing else on this msg board. I bought more more than a year ago and have been buying the dips and sweating. I have been wrong and long on stocks such as Cattles where I was fooled by a dishonest management. I don't believe Eric Daniels or Stephen Hester are of the same calibre. Furthermore as much as it would be flattering, I dont think I could have much of an impact on market sentiment these days - note these days - LOL. I do however, seriously believe that Lloyds and RBS will re-emerge as national champions, and as such, on a long enough time horizon will prove to be colossal investments. For the record, I am also long the house builders and insurance and feel the bond markets are due for a severe pasting.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.