Mark Hargraves
To print fund fact sheets, please use the print option in the Factsheet Tools section in the top right corner:
http://citywire.co.uk/manager/factsheet/d1246
Glossary
-
Fund
A way for individual investors to pool their money together, allowing them to invest in assets that would otherwise be unobtainable
-
Fund manager
The person who decides where the fund's money should be invested. As such, finding a talented manager (such as those with a Citywire rating) is of paramount importance
-
Sector
Funds are grouped together into sectors, allowing fund managers to be judged against their benchmarks and peer group. Each sector has rules about what assets funds are allowed to invest in
-
Assets
A generic term meaning 'what you own'. If you can buy it, it's an asset. In the world of investments the most common assets are shares, bonds, property and cash.
-
Asset class
A group of assets with similar properties. For example, while shares will rise or fall in price individually, economic factors can affect all shares similarly. The same economic factors might affect bonds very differently – so shares and bonds are separate asset classes.
-
Asset allocation
The process of deciding which asset classes to invest in. Successful asset allocation is often more important than selecting individual assets (for example deciding whether to invest mainly in shares, rather than which shares to invest in). Since most fund managers are tied to their sector rules, you need to either do your own asset allocation or buy a managed fund.
-
Benchmark
A measure of how different areas of the markets are performing, against which funds can be compared. For example, a fund in the UK All Companies sector might be compared against the FTSE All-Share index of every company traded on the London Stock Exchange. A good fund manager will be able to beat the benchmark most of the time, but very few can.
-
Securities
A contract representing something of financial value. Shares and bonds are the most common types of securities.
-
Managed funds
Unlike most funds, which are restricted to investing in particular markets by the rules of their sector, managed funds can invest in just about anything. While they can have subtly different objectives, they are split into 'Active Managed', where the manager is given free reign; 'Balanced Managed', where the manager can invest a maximum of 85% in shares to reduce risk; and 'Cautious Managed' with a 60% maximum in shares.
-
Shares
A share in a company represents part ownership of its assets (e.g. its buildings, intellectual property and so on) and its future income (paid out as dividends). The value of a share depends largely on other investors' expectations of the company's future growth and income.
-
Bonds
The process of deciding which asset classes to invest in. Successful asset allocation is often more important than selecting individual assets (for example deciding whether to invest mainly in shares, rather than which shares to invest in). Since most fund managers are tied to their sector rules, you need to either do your own asset allocation or buy a managed fund.
-
Risk
The possibility that your investment objectives won't be met. The most obvious variety is 'capital risk' – the possibility that you won't get your money back – but there are many other forms such as currency risk, income risk, inflation risk (that your investments won't keep pace with the cost of living) and so on. To get better returns, you must accept more risk – this is a law of physics in investing, no matter what the people who advertise funds like to claim. Understanding your own risk tolerance is crucial.
-
Return
A measure of how your investments have performed, relative to your initial investment. For example if you invest £1,000 in a fund, and a year later your investment is worth £1,100, you've made a 10% return.
-
Maximum loss
Otherwise known as maximum 'drawdown', this is a measure of how much you would lose if you bought an investment at its most expensive and sold at its cheapest (which, owing to the frailties of human psychology, often happens). For example if a fund was worth £1 a unit at one point but then fell to 50p – regardless of what happened in the meantime – the fund's loss would be 50%. Comparing the maximum loss for different managers over a given period is a good way of seeing who's doing the best job of safeguarding investors' money.
Mark Hargraves applies a blended stock selection style with a bias towards GARP for the AXA Framlington European unit trust. He joined AXA Framlington in 2000 after spells with United Friendly Asset Management and SG Hambros Fund Managers. Hargraves launched his career with a two-year stint as an assistant product manager at Abbey National from 1994 to 1996. He holds a Masters degree in Finance from the London Business School and a BSc Hons in Geography from Bristol University. He is also an Associate of the Institute of Investment Management and Research. When he is not managing money Hargraves enjoys the pursuits of golf, tennis and mountaineering.
Fund Group
AXA
Total returns in each sector over
-
Europe Excluding UK
-
Europe Excluding UK
34.8%Average manager 23.1%
Mark Hargraves has managed funds in the below sectors for less than 3 years
-
Global Equities
-
Global Equities
1 year8.7%Average manager 17.6%
Mark Hargraves also manages these funds
Fund Manager's UK Citywire Ratings History
- Not rated in Jan 2004
- Not rated in Feb 2004
- Not rated in Mar 2004
- Not rated in Apr 2004
- Not rated in May 2004
- Not rated in Jun 2004
- Not rated in Jul 2004
- Not rated in Aug 2004
- Not rated in Sep 2004
- Not rated in Oct 2004
- Not rated in Nov 2004
- Not rated in Dec 2004
- Not rated in Jan 2005
- Not rated in Feb 2005
- Not rated in Mar 2005
- Not rated in Apr 2005
- Not rated in May 2005
- Not rated in Jun 2005
- Rated A in Jul 2005
- Not rated in Aug 2005
- Rated A in Sep 2005
- Rated A in Oct 2005
- Not rated in Nov 2005
- Not rated in Dec 2005
- Not rated in Jan 2006
- Rated A in Feb 2006
- Rated AA in Mar 2006
- Rated AA in Apr 2006
- Rated AA in May 2006
- Rated A in Jun 2006
- Rated A in Jul 2006
- Rated AA in Aug 2006
- Rated A in Sep 2006
- Rated A in Oct 2006
- Not rated in Nov 2006
- Not rated in Dec 2006
- Not rated in Jan 2007
- Not rated in Feb 2007
- Not rated in Mar 2007
- Not rated in Apr 2007
- Not rated in May 2007
- Not rated in Jun 2007
- Not rated in Jul 2007
- Not rated in Aug 2007
- Not rated in Sep 2007
- Not rated in Oct 2007
- Not rated in Nov 2007
- Not rated in Dec 2007
- Not rated in Jan 2008
- Not rated in Feb 2008
- Not rated in Mar 2008
- Not rated in Apr 2008
- Not rated in May 2008
- Not rated in Jun 2008
- Not rated in Jul 2008
- Not rated in Aug 2008
- Not rated in Sep 2008
- Not rated in Oct 2008
- Not rated in Nov 2008
- Not rated in Dec 2008
- Not rated in Jan 2009
- Not rated in Feb 2009
- Not rated in Mar 2009
- Not rated in Apr 2009
- Not rated in May 2009
- Not rated in Jun 2009
- Not rated in Jul 2009
- Not rated in Aug 2009
- Not rated in Sep 2009
- Not rated in Oct 2009
- Not rated in Nov 2009
- Not rated in Dec 2009
- Not rated in Jan 2010
- Not rated in Feb 2010
- Not rated in Mar 2010
- Not rated in Apr 2010
- Not rated in May 2010
- Not rated in Jun 2010
- Not rated in Jul 2010
- Not rated in Aug 2010
- Not rated in Sep 2010
- Not rated in Oct 2010
- Not rated in Nov 2010
- Not rated in Dec 2010
- Not rated in Jan 2011
- Not rated in Feb 2011
- Not rated in Mar 2011
- Not rated in Apr 2011
- Not rated in May 2011
- Not rated in Jun 2011
- Not rated in Jul 2011
- Not rated in Aug 2011
- Not rated in Sep 2011
- Not rated in Oct 2011
- Rated A in Nov 2011
- Not rated in Dec 2011
- Not rated in Jan 2012
- Not rated in Feb 2012
- Rated A in Mar 2012
- Rated A in Apr 2012
- Rated AA in May 2012
- Rated AA in Jun 2012
- Rated A in Jul 2012
- Rated AA in Aug 2012
- Rated AA in Sep 2012
- Rated AA in Oct 2012
- Rated AA in Nov 2012
- Rated AAA in Dec 2012
- Rated AA in Jan 2013
- Rated AAA in Feb 2013
- Rated AA in Mar 2013
- Rated AA in Apr 2013
- Rated AA in May 2013
How has Mark Hargraves performed over
- Cumulative and discrete performance’
- Cumulative performance
- Discrete performance
- Compare
Add items for comparison
- Funds
- Managers
- Benchmarks
- £ or %
Currency or Percentage
- Reset
Fund Manager's UK Citywire Ratings History
- Not rated in Jan 2004
- Not rated in Feb 2004
- Not rated in Mar 2004
- Not rated in Apr 2004
- Not rated in May 2004
- Not rated in Jun 2004
- Not rated in Jul 2004
- Not rated in Aug 2004
- Not rated in Sep 2004
- Not rated in Oct 2004
- Not rated in Nov 2004
- Not rated in Dec 2004
- Not rated in Jan 2005
- Not rated in Feb 2005
- Not rated in Mar 2005
- Not rated in Apr 2005
- Not rated in May 2005
- Not rated in Jun 2005
- Rated A in Jul 2005
- Not rated in Aug 2005
- Rated A in Sep 2005
- Rated A in Oct 2005
- Not rated in Nov 2005
- Not rated in Dec 2005
- Not rated in Jan 2006
- Rated A in Feb 2006
- Rated AA in Mar 2006
- Rated AA in Apr 2006
- Rated AA in May 2006
- Rated A in Jun 2006
- Rated A in Jul 2006
- Rated AA in Aug 2006
- Rated A in Sep 2006
- Rated A in Oct 2006
- Not rated in Nov 2006
- Not rated in Dec 2006
- Not rated in Jan 2007
- Not rated in Feb 2007
- Not rated in Mar 2007
- Not rated in Apr 2007
- Not rated in May 2007
- Not rated in Jun 2007
- Not rated in Jul 2007
- Not rated in Aug 2007
- Not rated in Sep 2007
- Not rated in Oct 2007
- Not rated in Nov 2007
- Not rated in Dec 2007
- Not rated in Jan 2008
- Not rated in Feb 2008
- Not rated in Mar 2008
- Not rated in Apr 2008
- Not rated in May 2008
- Not rated in Jun 2008
- Not rated in Jul 2008
- Not rated in Aug 2008
- Not rated in Sep 2008
- Not rated in Oct 2008
- Not rated in Nov 2008
- Not rated in Dec 2008
- Not rated in Jan 2009
- Not rated in Feb 2009
- Not rated in Mar 2009
- Not rated in Apr 2009
- Not rated in May 2009
- Not rated in Jun 2009
- Not rated in Jul 2009
- Not rated in Aug 2009
- Not rated in Sep 2009
- Not rated in Oct 2009
- Not rated in Nov 2009
- Not rated in Dec 2009
- Not rated in Jan 2010
- Not rated in Feb 2010
- Not rated in Mar 2010
- Not rated in Apr 2010
- Not rated in May 2010
- Not rated in Jun 2010
- Not rated in Jul 2010
- Not rated in Aug 2010
- Not rated in Sep 2010
- Not rated in Oct 2010
- Not rated in Nov 2010
- Not rated in Dec 2010
- Not rated in Jan 2011
- Not rated in Feb 2011
- Not rated in Mar 2011
- Not rated in Apr 2011
- Not rated in May 2011
- Not rated in Jun 2011
- Not rated in Jul 2011
- Not rated in Aug 2011
- Not rated in Sep 2011
- Not rated in Oct 2011
- Rated A in Nov 2011
- Not rated in Dec 2011
- Not rated in Jan 2012
- Not rated in Feb 2012
- Rated A in Mar 2012
- Rated A in Apr 2012
- Rated AA in May 2012
- Rated AA in Jun 2012
- Rated A in Jul 2012
- Rated AA in Aug 2012
- Rated AA in Sep 2012
- Rated AA in Oct 2012
- Rated AA in Nov 2012
- Rated AAA in Dec 2012
- Rated AA in Jan 2013
- Rated AAA in Feb 2013
- Rated AA in Mar 2013
- Rated AA in Apr 2013
- Rated AA in May 2013
How has this fund manager performed comparedto rivals over
Portions of the information contained in this factsheet were derived by Citywire Financial Publishers Ltd using content supplied by Lipper, a Reuters Company.



